ChiefsPlanet Mobile
Page 474 of 484
« First < 374424464470471472473474 475476477478 > Last »
Nzoner's Game Room>*** Official 2017 Royals Repository ***
Chiefspants 10:55 AM 04-05-2017
Chiefsplanet’s (Proposed) 2017 Season Title: One Last Ride

Midish-Season Update (Royals 51-47, 2nd Wild Card, 1.5 GB of ALC):

We're halfway through 2017, and fittingly to the Chiefsplanet's 2017 Season Title, the Royals are all-in on what will likely be one final run with the current core. While many are worried the Royals will take a 2004 style tumble after this year, the farm system is hardly the barren wasteland it was during the Baird years. To see what's in the pipeline and what we have to look forward to, check out this exceptional list and analysis that Duncan put together of our system.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...htmlview#gid=0

While I had the honor of starting this thread this year, Duncan will always have a VIP pass to this OP, and can add more content at any time.

2017's Burning Questions Revisited:

1. What is the threshold between being “buyers” and “sellers” at the deadline?

We're buyers, baby.

In April, I argued that it would be a wise strategy for us to sell if we were 5 GB or worse, but that Dayton would likely add supplemental pieces for us to load up for another run if we were 1-2 GB. On July 24th, the Royals found themselves in sole possession of the 2nd wild card spot and 1.5 games back of the division. In April I said the Royals might pull the trigger on someone like Alex Cobb and resign Luke Hochevar, but since the Rays are also buyers and Luke's shoulder hasn't rebounded, this prediction hasn't come to fruition. Luckily, Dayton Moore again proved much more adept and creative than me by adding Trevor Cahill (good call, Duncan), Brandon Maurer and Ryan Buchter in a single trade. Giving us a solid starter to compete in 2017, and two relievers whom we will control through 2019 and 2021, respectively, keeping Moore's new vision through 2019-2020 intact. Moore has hinted that the Royals will continue to pursue the right deals if they're there, so the fun may not be over just yet. While we may not have the bullets to pull in a "star" like Cueto or Zo, Moore's adeptness may yet again net us what we need for another run in October.

2. Can Gordo and Moose bounce back to 2015 levels?

In April I asked if Gordo could at least set the table at a 265/325/425 clip and if Moose could deliver damage around a 265/335/500 clip for an entire year. This season Mr. Moustakas has been the prospect that was promised, delivering at a 277/307/568 clip as of this update. Gordo, on the other hand, has put up an unbelievably abysmal line thus far. But, if there is a silver lining, it's that Gordo has performed at a 246/311/432 line since June 1st, and if he can continue to perform near that mark, he will be more than a valuable asset at the bottom of the lineup while he continues to provide the best LF defense in the league.

3. Can Ned Yost manage a bullpen?

In April, I felt that despite the poor start, Royals bullpen would ultimately be "solid" this year, but the question was whether "solid" was good enough for Ned. I argued that the Royals needed Soria to bounce back and that Ned would need to start being strategic in his L/L and R/R matchups. While Ned has still made at times baffling and frustrating decisions with his starters (such as allowing Travis Wood to try to "get the win" and still insisting on sending Hammel out for the 6th, he's mostly done a good job).

MASH: Minor/Moylan - Alexander - Soria - Herrera (Credit to C3HIEF3S for the origins of the phrase) have cemented into reliable pieces, and now that Herrera is showing signs of stabilizing, our dumping of Wood, our call up Flynn, and the acquisition of Buchter and Maurer, the Royals have the potential to enter October with one of the best and deepest bullpens in the postseason.

4. Will the Royals find a boost from an unexpected X-Factor to lift them to contention?

Cool-Whit, Boni, Mike ****ing Minor, and Alexander have come up huge thus far. Cool Whit is, incredibly, is second on the team in WAR and has more than replaced Zo's presence on the team. They, like the X-Factors on the 2014-2015 teams, have been critical cogs as we've raced back to contention, while Cool-Whit and Boni also have provided a rosier outlook for this team's future. It's worth noting that Salvador Perez and Jason Vargas has been beasts on offense and the mound (along with Sal providing his customary defensive excellence), but I am still a bit wary of Salvy's annual Yost assisted offensive drought as the team moves into August, along with Vargy regressing to his averages.

5. Can Jorge Soler and Brandon Moss be productive contributors in Kauffman’s dimensions?

Ouch, no, but the Royals shift to power-hitting in the juiced ball era looks like one that will pay off. Thankfully, Moss is showing signs of entering his seasonal hot streak where he becomes corn-fed Jesus for a month, and we'll need him hot to keep up with Cleveland down the stretch. While Jorge has been painful to watch in the majors, his scorching performance in AAA should give one a bright hope for the future. While some may disagree, I offer Moose, Hos, Gordo, and Duffy's struggles as exhibit A for why it is far too early to give up on Soler's potential.

Bonus Question - Is Raul Mondesi truly ready to be an everyday player?

Ha! Not even close. However, like Soler, his progress in AAA is incredibly encouraging. With ceilings like Lindor and floors being Esky being thrown out there, it's hard not to be excited about his future.

The Picture Forward

There are many reasons to be excited, and not only for 2017. The Royals emergence of Cool Whit, Bonifacio, and Scott Alexander, and the fact that we have pieces like Salvador Perez, Danny Duffy, Kelvin Herrera, Jorge Soler, Ryan Buchter, Brandon Maurer Cheslor Cuthbert, and Raul Mondesi until at least 2019 should leave one feeling pretty optimistic. Re-up Moose or Hos (and heck, re-sign Dyson while we're at it), and suddenly this team looks very much like one that could compete for the indefinite future.

The Royals are all in again, buckle in and enjoy the ride.

April OP:

Spoiler!

[Reply]
'Hamas' Jenkins 10:10 PM 10-14-2017
Originally Posted by Chiefspants:
Cueto was certainly our ace in the 2015 postseason.
You can't call a guy an ace if you have to start him at home because you're terrified of what will happen to him if he pitches on the road.
[Reply]
Chiefspants 10:14 PM 10-14-2017
Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins:
You can't call a guy an ace if you have to start him at home because you're terrified of what will happen to him if he pitches on the road.
Is Kershaw not an ace because they're afraid to put him in during the 7th inning?

Semantics. Whatever. He pitched two 2 hitters in the 2015 postseason, and a historic complete game in Game 2 of the World Series.

Call it whatever you want to, but Cueto was unhittable when he was on that postseason, and we likely don't win the 15' series without him.
[Reply]
Demonpenz 01:16 AM 10-15-2017
Originally Posted by Superbowltrashcan:
If he was on the Royals' staff at the start of this year, I assume he would have pitched Opening Day, don't you? Not being a smart aleck just wondering if this premise is one you agree with and if so doesn't it support the "Ace" moniker?
I would still think duffy would have been ahead of him I might be wrong but it seems like Verlander hasn't been good for a couple years and just recently found it again. Could be wrong etc just seems like people are talking like this is Verlander of 10 years ago.
[Reply]
Prison Bitch 07:55 AM 10-15-2017
Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins:
You can't call a guy an ace if you have to start him at home because you're terrified of what will happen to him if he pitches on the road.
This
[Reply]
Prison Bitch 07:59 AM 10-15-2017
Originally Posted by tk13:
Far be it for me to agree with Hootie, but I'd rather have an ace pitcher than not. It doesn't guarantee anything, but when you're in the playoffs everyone has decent pitching. Obviously someone is going to lose.
er.
But that's not what the Grantland study showed. That was the entire argument: they found almost ZERO correlation between regular season and postseason performance since the 1969 expanded format
[Reply]
siberian khatru 10:11 AM 10-15-2017
Originally Posted by Demonpenz:
I would still think duffy would have been ahead of him I might be wrong but it seems like Verlander hasn't been good for a couple years and just recently found it again. Could be wrong etc just seems like people are talking like this is Verlander of 10 years ago.
Verlander finished second in the Cy Young voting in 2016 after putting up a 6.6 bWAR season.
[Reply]
Chiefspants 10:13 AM 10-15-2017
Originally Posted by siberian khatru:
Verlander finished second in the Cy Young voting in 2016 after putting up a 6.6 bWAR season.
And let's be real, he should have won.
[Reply]
duncan_idaho 11:16 AM 10-15-2017
Originally Posted by Chiefspants:
And let's be real, he should have won.

Yes. Because Rick Porcello is really garbage.

Kate Upton was rather upset. She thought she was the only person who got to fuck Verlander.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
[Reply]
Chiefspants 11:31 AM 10-15-2017
Originally Posted by duncan_idaho:
Yes. Because Rick Porcello is really garbage.

Kate Upton was rather upset. She thought she was the only person who got to **** Verlander.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I hope those two Tampa writers who voted when there was still two weeks left to the season were banished to Siberia.
[Reply]
tk13 11:35 AM 10-15-2017
Originally Posted by Prison Bitch:
But that's not what the Grantland study showed. That was the entire argument: they found almost ZERO correlation between regular season and postseason performance since the 1969 expanded format
I am not arguing that the best pitchers in the regular season are always the best pitchers in the postseason. I'm fairly sure that's not true. Just look at Clayton Kershaw.

I'm saying that most teams who win have an true ace pitcher who they can either A) hand the ball to and trust to go 8-9 innings or B) is so good they bring him in relief on short rest because he's such a good pitcher. Even in this era of power bullpens every winning team this decade has done that. Jon Lester won game 5 then pitched 3 innings of relief last year in game 7 on short rest. Cueto threw one of the best starts in recent playoff history. We all know what Bumgarner has done. The Cardinals could hand the ball to Chris Carpenter and he'd deliver.

I'm pretty sure every one of those guys is a multi-time All-Star and has finished 1st or 2nd in the Cy Young voting... except for Bumgarner, who might be the best postseason pitcher of all time. But go ahead and say he's not an ace pitcher.
[Reply]
Chiefspants 11:38 AM 10-15-2017
Originally Posted by Prison Bitch:
This
We paid a high price for Cueto so we could have an ace that we could hand the ball to in the World Series.

Ultimately, he responded by pitching a two hitter and giving us a championship. He did exactly what we were hoping he would do.
[Reply]
duncan_idaho 08:10 AM 10-16-2017
Originally Posted by Chiefspants:
We paid a high price for Cueto so we could have an ace that we could hand the ball to in the World Series.



Ultimately, responded by pitching a two hitter and giving us a championship. He did exactly what we were hoping he would do.

And, ultimately, the price ended up being a pittance.

A fringe major league player and two relievers...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
[Reply]
Chiefspants 09:54 AM 10-16-2017
Originally Posted by duncan_idaho:
And, ultimately, the price ended up being a pittance.

A fringe major league player and two relievers...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Oh absolutely. The fact that there is still any lingering disappointment over Cueto is baffling to me. The dude was simply legendary in a do or die game and on the game's biggest stage just two weeks later. Cueto's contributions to our championship are criminally underrated in KC.

Seriously, I highly recommend everyone re-watch either Game 5 of the ALDS or Game 2 of the WS. I had forgotten how dominant Cueto was in those performances, and to borrow a premonition from Hootie, I don't think KC had an ace-like performance like that since the Greinke era (though one could make an argument for Shields in August-September of 14').

Love you always, Cueto.


[Reply]
Prison Bitch 10:05 AM 10-16-2017
Originally Posted by Chiefspants:
We paid a high price for Cueto so we could have an ace that we could hand the ball to in the World Series.

Ultimately, he responded by pitching a two hitter and giving us a championship. He did exactly what we were hoping he would do.
I'm glad we got him but you conveniently left out his so-so regular season for us, his poor start vd HOU and his absolute firebombing in toronto
[Reply]
Chiefspants 10:27 AM 10-16-2017
Originally Posted by Prison Bitch:
I'm glad we got him but you conveniently left out his so-so regular season for us, his poor start vd HOU and his absolute firebombing in toronto
The regular season stoof is white noise to me, I honestly wouldn't have cared if Johnny posted a 135.00 ERA in the regular season. He was brought in for one reason, and that was to deliver in the playoffs. Johnny did just that. IIRC, Madison Bumgarner got firebombed in the September of 14', but I doubt any Giants fans are left ruminating on that.

As for the first Houston start and the start against Toronto, after watching the likes of Kershaw and Kluber get rocked in the postseason, bad starts against top-tier lineups are bound to happen, I think (your own analysis about postseason aces applies here). However, I think what separates truly dominant performers from the fact is found in their dominant starts - and Cueto delivered two of those with the highest stakes in the game.
[Reply]
Page 474 of 484
« First < 374424464470471472473474 475476477478 > Last »
Up