He doesn't have the peak argument against MJ. You're just delusional.

Or disingenuous. It's not like you actually try to make the peak argument. It's always longevity.
[Reply]

Should I re-post the 9 times he led the league in VORP again?

And even if you somehow gave MJ the slight edge on peak (which I don't concede), the longevity of LeBron blows that edge completely out of the water by this point. The guy is gonna end up playing like 10 more seasons than MJ, all at a top 10 level. :-)
[Reply]

Basically, you'd have to resort at this point to making some kind of Sandy Koufax argument re MJ's alleged GOAT status. A sad fall for him.
[Reply]

Nobody cares about your bullshit statistics. For crying out loud, you legit tried to post a stat that says Lebron ACKSHUALLY earned more championships than MJ.

MJ was the better scorer and defender. Lebron was the better passer and more versatile defender, that's it. Those are the facts.
[Reply]

Jordan's peak: 86-91 and in that time he averaged a 31.1 PER, put up 97.2 wins and 55.9 VORP.

Lebron's peak was probably 08-13 and he went for a 30.4 PER, 88 wins and a 47.4 VORP.

Jordan's peak was just better.
[Reply]

So it's just that simple, is it? :-)
[Reply]

This is why he usually just sticks to the longevity argument :-)
[Reply]

Is Sandy Koufax the greatest pitcher of all time?
[Reply]

Says the guy that posts cherry picked stats and totals. Why don't you respond to DJ's post?
[Reply]

I did.
[Reply]

You are smarter than this. cmon man.

He is either 1A or 1B all time no need to make up stuff.
[Reply]

Not a response, just deflection.

We can ask you the same Mr. Longevity.

Is Emmit Smith the greatest RB ever?
[Reply]

There is when the overwhelming consensus is that he's #2 and you just can't accept that reality :-)
[Reply]

RE: Jordan and Lebron


[Reply]

You can't even appreciate the greatness of Jokic, so you should probably just avoid the NBA all together...
[Reply]