Originally Posted by royr17:
OK, I need your help in settling a disagreement with a fellow member.
He claims Anthony Davis was a beter LB for the Chiefs than Marvcus Patton.
Need your opinons.
Poll coming.
Most definitly DAVIS! Davis was awesome at MLB. Patton was good but at the end of his career when we got him. And I am not sure he ever played with the intensity Davis had. [Reply]
Davis was good but he had alot of talent around him to make him better, Patton was older at the time but he was a true leader of a defense when the defense didnt have players like Smith, Thomas, Simien, Edwards, and Carter. [Reply]
Originally Posted by royr17:
Davis was good but he had alot of talent around him to make him better, Patton was older at the time but he was a true leader of a defense when the defense didnt have players like Smith, Thomas, Simien, Edwards, and Carter.
I disagree. Davis played with much more intensity than Patton. Don;t ge tme wrong I liek Patton he was good for our team. But I think toe-toe Davis was more intense and harder hitting. [Reply]
Originally Posted by royr17:
Davis was good but he had alot of talent around him to make him better, Patton was older at the time but he was a true leader of a defense when the defense didnt have players like Smith, Thomas, Simien, Edwards, and Carter.
It's ok, Roy. People have different opinions. Just because you think yours is correct doesn't make everyone else a moron.