LeBron is probably just shaking in fear after seeing those worldbeater Celtics perform tonight as the #1 seed. King hit this prediction right on the mark. [Reply]
He is so inconsistent in the playoffs and always has been for the last 3,4 years. **** him!
Inconsistent is a nice way of saying absolute trash, but it should be mentioned that if it wasn't for Kyle Lowry, this entire era of Raptors basketball would have never happened. [Reply]
Originally Posted by RealSNR:
He WAS winning in OKC. He didn't have to stay there, but he chose the ****ing Warriors. That's way more egregious than Lebron joining the Heat.
**** Durant and **** the Warriors.
Presti traded off Harden and Ibaka. I don't blame him at all for wanting to get the **** out of town. [Reply]
Originally Posted by KC_Connection:
LeBron is probably just shaking in fear after seeing those worldbeater Celtics perform tonight as the #1 seed. King hit this prediction right on the mark.
No team in the East is going to beat the Cavs unless there is a team out there that can score with them and play above average D. [Reply]
Originally Posted by KC_Connection:
Inconsistent is a nice way of saying absolute trash, but it should be mentioned that if it wasn't for Kyle Lowry, this entire era of Raptors basketball would have never happened.
I know.
He was key in the Raptors turnaround.
He could get them into the playoffs but will never be the guy to lead them to a championship.
I think they need to go in another direction at PG. [Reply]
Originally Posted by KC_Connection:
LeBron is probably just shaking in fear after seeing those worldbeater Celtics perform tonight as the #1 seed. King hit this prediction right on the mark.
They were one miss away from losing to the 8 seed. When LeBron wasn't on the court they gave up 158 points per 100 possessions. That's amazingly bad. I don't see how you can talk like they performed so great.
And what happened to the raptors being better than the Celtics and wizards while we're talking about failed predictions? Posted via Mobile Device [Reply]