Not a chance. Hill, in this offense when healthy, is just too damned dynamic on too many levels to even consider trading away. The plays he opens up JUST GOING IN MOTION is worth keeping him for as long as he can produce.
In this era of NFL football where offenses reign supreme, you absolutely do NOT trade away a player of Hill's magnitude. [Reply]
Hardman was his replacement so the team had prepared.
So far we’re seeing what it would have been like w/o Hill. Not as doom and gloom as everyone expected, lol.
As the season progresses, teams will start playing Hardman like they do Hill imo.
Maybe not think so much about moving Hill, but Robinson’s playing on the last year of his contract and Watkins. Our #3-4 WR is #2-3 on other rosters so why not flip one of the last year contract guys for a dB? Does Jacksonville need WRs, lol? Already have one of our WRs., Conley.
Ramsey’s about the last decent dB available before deadline that we know about?
Arizona isn’t gonna give PP up either imo. Not with them playing inspired football. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Chargem:
Putting 40 up on the Ravens without Hill probably makes me feel better about having to cut or trade Watkins next year for cap reasons I guess?
Although I still don't feel great about that because DRob is probably a goner too.
So who would next years starters be besides Hardman and Hill? No one else under contract if they cut Watkins iirc?
Not having a possession WR would be ok with Kelce. I don’t think he runs many te routes anyways, lol.
Andy said Drob is a Superstar in the making too. [Reply]
All of you who keep believing EVERYONE will be gone next year just remember that winning and having a QBOTF helps with a lot of creative cap rejiggering and keeping players who might otherwise be gone. [Reply]