Chiefs Are you in favor of releasing Tyreek Hill? - Page 52

Originally Posted by Cave Johnson:
You’re delusional.

Liar I’m the GOAT here bitch ass. I’m rubber you’re glue what you say bounces off me and sticks to uou
[Reply]

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy:
Wow...52% of the board fell for this bitches shit.

:-) 100% of this boards male members have fallen for a bitches shit at some point or another. And I am guessing over half the female members. :-)
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Bowser:

via GIPHY

:-) Perfect
[Reply]

Please close this thread now. It ain't happening.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by ARROW2:
Please close this thread now. It ain't happening.

IT'S NOT HAPPENING!!!
[Reply]

Originally Posted by ARROW2:
Please close this thread now. It ain't happening.

[Reply]

Originally Posted by Sorce:
For anyone that voted yes, I've heard This pairs well with crow.

I'll eat my crow. I was convinced by the bullshit he was fucked. I didn't want it to be so, but was fooled by the tools.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by WhiteWhale:
Yeah, I mean I was in support of keeping him even if he was found guilty. Voted that way weeks ago. Made some comments, but to REITERATE those comments:

KC didn't get any brownie points for releasing the BEST RUNNING BACK IN FOOTBALL who just joined another team. That team wasn't punished.

KC did the 'right thing' and was objectively harmed by it.

If the ****ing NFL wants teams to do the right thing, they need to give some incentive. Instead that incentive is on signing problem players to budget contracts.

Releasing Hunt was a mistake. You don't make the same mistake twice. Make him donate to a domestic abuse center. Give him counseling. There are a number of things you can do if the players' best interest is the goal, but all the goddamn media pressure for KC to release him only for the same media ****s to praise Dorsey and Cleveland REALLY chapped my ass.

**** the NFL. **** optics. **** the sports media. Keep Hill. If the NFL wants to ban him, they can ****ing do it. Don't put the onus on an individual team to harm themselves for the sake of the league's image.

The guy would just end up on some other team and get rebranded by the same media and league as some prodigal HOFer.

KC did NOT do the right thing and should have NEVER expected "brownie" points for being objectively stupid.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by 65TPT:
I'll eat my crow. I was convinced by the bullshit he was ****ed. I didn't want it to be so, but was fooled by the tools.

Even if he was ****ed, what was the advantage of releasing him AT THAT TIME? I can't begin to wrap my head around the kind of stupid that thinks that would be a good idea.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by ARROW2:
Please close this thread now. It ain't happening.

Why? This thread is incredibly revealing. It should serve as a reminder of how stupid/gullible Chief Fan can be.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by jjchieffan:
I did vote no. Weeks later when we had more information.

Why did you need more information? What advantage would have been gained by releasing him immediately?
[Reply]

I'm here to some crow... Thank God.
[Reply]

Never voted. There was not enough corroborating information when this thread was created.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla:
Why? This thread is incredibly revealing. It should serve as a reminder of how stupid/gullible Chief Fan can be.

Yep. I was one of the early NO voters. I thought it funny as hell to see how many of Yes voters got so pissed at anyone who voted NO. :-)
[Reply]

Originally Posted by TEX:
Yep. I was one of the early NO voters. I thought it funny as hell to see how many of Yes voters got so pissed at anyone who voted NO. :-)

yeah it was really lopsided in the beginning

pussies :-)
[Reply]