ChiefsPlanet Mobile
Page 1352 of 3903
« First < 35285212521302134213481349135013511352 135313541355135613621402145218522352 > Last »
Nzoner's Game Room>***NON-POLITICAL COVID-19 Discussion Thread***
JakeF 10:28 PM 02-26-2020
A couple of reminders...

Originally Posted by Bwana:
Once again, don't come in this thread with some kind of political agenda, or you will be shown the door. If you want to go that route, there is a thread about this in DC.
Originally Posted by Dartgod:
People, there is a lot of good information in this thread, let's try to keep the petty bickering to a minimum.

We all have varying opinions about the impact of this, the numbers, etc. We will all never agree with each other. But we can all keep it civil.

Thanks!

Click here for the original OP:

Spoiler!

[Reply]
Mecca 09:06 AM 04-13-2020
Originally Posted by Bearcat:

via GIPHY


[Reply]
BleedingRed 09:07 AM 04-13-2020
Originally Posted by Mecca:
Considering how awful are testing numbers are, especially in non big city areas, how much can maps like this really be trusted?
Saying Testing numbers are awful when we are close to top in the world in any metric you can think of minus testing per million which again, takes into account countries with less population than Kansas City is dumb.

By any standard the United States has amazing testing going on right now. So move off this point.
[Reply]
Mecca 09:08 AM 04-13-2020
Originally Posted by BleedingRed:
Saying Testing numbers are awful when we are close to top in the world in any metric you can think of minus testing per million which again, takes into account countries with less population than Kansas City is dumb.

By any standard the United States has amazing testing going on right now. So move off this point.
.7 is an impressive number when we have a person that posts here who discussed his false negative...
[Reply]
Donger 09:10 AM 04-13-2020
Originally Posted by BleedingRed:
Saying Testing numbers are awful when we are close to top in the world in any metric you can think of minus testing per million which again, takes into account countries with less population than Kansas City is dumb.

By any standard the United States has amazing testing going on right now. So move off this point.
Wait, you STILL don't understand why per capita is the only metric which actually matters?
[Reply]
dirk digler 09:12 AM 04-13-2020
Originally Posted by BleedingRed:
Saying Testing numbers are awful when we are close to top in the world in any metric you can think of minus testing per million which again, takes into account countries with less population than Kansas City is dumb.

By any standard the United States has amazing testing going on right now. So move off this point.

have to disagree. Our testing is abysmal and people still can't get tests.
[Reply]
limested 09:12 AM 04-13-2020
Originally Posted by BleedingRed:
Saying Testing numbers are awful when we are close to top in the world in any metric you can think of minus testing per million which again, takes into account countries with less population than Kansas City is dumb.

By any standard the United States has amazing testing going on right now. So move off this point.
When comparing to other countries test per million is the only metric that you can compare. Actual numbers are pointless.
[Reply]
BleedingRed 09:18 AM 04-13-2020
Originally Posted by limested:
When comparing to other countries test per million is the only metric that you can compare. Actual numbers are pointless.
Cool well we should be passing S. Korea soon on test per Million, then Germany. Etc...

Considering we are testing more per a day, wont be long till we pass alot of countries who are doing "better"
[Reply]
Mecca 09:18 AM 04-13-2020
Originally Posted by BleedingRed:
Cool well we should be passing S. Korea soon on test per Million, then Germany. Etc...

Considering we are testing more per a day, wont be long till we pass alot of countries who are doing "better"
They have less people so that is helpful to them I'd say.
[Reply]
O.city 09:19 AM 04-13-2020
We need to get to the point of testing 1 percent of the pop per week
[Reply]
BleedingRed 09:21 AM 04-13-2020
Originally Posted by O.city:
We need to get to the point of testing 1 percent of the pop per week
I would suspect that is impossible. The highest we have gotten is 200k tests in one day. In order for us to get to 1% it would have to be 500k a day.
[Reply]
dirk digler 09:21 AM 04-13-2020
Originally Posted by O.city:
We need to get to the point of testing 1 percent of the pop per week

Yep plus we need to get our health care workers first in line. Currently barely any of them have been tested. That would be a good start.
[Reply]
KC Dan 09:22 AM 04-13-2020
Originally Posted by dirk digler:
What states? Newsom banned gatherings over 250 people on March 12 and on March 15 asked people to voluntary closure of bars and in-home self-isolation of seniors 65 and older, as well as persons at-risk due to underlying conditions.

Other than that nothing changed until the official stay at home order on March 19th.
Ok, I'll just give my example - Washington. Without a state order, schools and businesses shut down well before the gov order . For example, even though my company is essential (semiconductor) and exempt, we've been working from home since March 6th... but whatever you know more than anyone cause....and my son lives in Seattle and works in Bellvue and has been working from home even longer..
[Reply]
petegz28 09:24 AM 04-13-2020
Originally Posted by Mecca:
Considering how awful are testing numbers are, especially in non big city areas, how much can maps like this really be trusted?
What numbers are you going to trust then? This is the problem, people present numbers then other people come up with reasons why they don't believe them.
[Reply]
Mecca 09:24 AM 04-13-2020
Originally Posted by petegz28:
What numbers are you going to trust then? This is the problem, people present numbers then other people come up with reasons why they don't believe them.
I don't have a ton of trust in any numbers because there is no way in knowing what is accurate or not.
[Reply]
Marcellus 09:25 AM 04-13-2020
Originally Posted by petegz28:
What numbers are you going to trust then? This is the problem, people present numbers then other people come up with reasons why they don't believe them.
Yup.
[Reply]
Page 1352 of 3903
« First < 35285212521302134213481349135013511352 135313541355135613621402145218522352 > Last »
Up