Yeah, they even said so in their press release. The NFL (not the Patriots) are conducting an investigation. Do you want them BOTH to investigate? How does that make any sense?
[Reply]

This is accurate.
[Reply]

That seems to the norm, for both the team and NFL to investigate.

When the audio of Tyreek Hill came out the Chiefs immediately suspended him from the facility while the investigation played out.

But the Chiefs are a classier organization than the Patriots. The Patriots don't punish their own players. They don't give a fuck.
[Reply]

Nick Wright points out that nearly every time Brown gets in the shit, he claims "they're" just after his money.
[Reply]

Hill did not abuse his son.
[Reply]

He shouldn't play while the NFL investigates something this serious.

Reek wasn't even charged with anything and he was suspended by his own team...for months.

Pats aren't doing the right thing, and you know it.
[Reply]

Not in this case. According to her they only had penaration once when AB "raped" her.

But yeah in some random situatation its true.
[Reply]

So either he’s REALLY unlucky or he’s a POS liar.
[Reply]

I wasn't speaking about the AB case, specifically. I have no idea what actually happened in that situation.
[Reply]

Sweet. A Pats troll hiding behind a Mahomes username.
[Reply]

The Patriot Way
[Reply]

Why is suspending a player in which has not been charged with a crime the right thing to do?
[Reply]

Because it’s very possible that you will be allowing a rapist to play for your team this Sunday. It’s not like he’s been anything close to a model citizen as of late either.

Until he’s cleared, the classy thing to do would be to suspend him pending an investigation.
[Reply]

31 teams in the league would.

But...you know, the Patriots.
[Reply]

Because he's got a gigantic list of conduct that's a detriment to the league. At some point you have to give the piling accusations some merit.

Rape Fan.
[Reply]