So how is it a slow rollback?
[Reply]

I say they give him 4 weeks to recover and 1 week to get back in game shape and back in the fold and he's back by week 7. Although I wouldn't be surprised to see him back week 6 because of how well he takes care of his body and how little it would take for him to get in game shape.
[Reply]

hopefully he comes back for the home game against Houston Oct 14 .

If not against the Packers 2 weeks later
[Reply]

The history of others with this injury was around 5 weeks. That’s probably what this will be
[Reply]

Was listening to a doctor talk about this yesterday on ESPN and they stated only 3% of all collarbone injuries fall into this category. The whole Amendola injury situation led to training of all NFL medical teams so that local hospitals would have a response for this particular situation including a trauma surgeon being on call.
[Reply]

Yeah, I think he'll be back before 4 weeks.

I bet he's back for the Bronco or Lions game.
[Reply]

First "report" of what might happen was "a couple" weeks from PFT.

This likely came from a source close to the Chiefs, who are feeding that info to media members.
[Reply]

Ain't happening.

Even Rapsheet floated the idea this morning that it could be longer than six weeks.
[Reply]

Would be nice to get him back for the Thursday nighter in Dungver. Fresh legs to help with the short week.
[Reply]

I don't understand why you are having trouble grasping the fact that this is a variable length injury. No one knows. He's week to week, and he'll play when he can play. Any other number is just guesswork.
[Reply]

Because he's already committed to the idea of 6+ weeks which will allow him to claim being right and being right and trolling is all he cares about.
[Reply]

Basically no one thinks it's going to be less than four weeks now.
[Reply]

It would not make me right. It would make my source accurate. And I would like to trust him so I can use him in the future to bring you more rumors. Because rumors are fun!
[Reply]

Clay has been the most annoying faggot on this board ever since the Tyreek shit.
[Reply]

This does not vindicate you, you realize. "Damaging the aortic arch" does not mean the same thing as "cutting off blood supply to the aorta"

A very traumatic dislocation could tear through a lot of mediastinal structures, including the aortic arch, leading to devastating bleeding, morbidity, etc.

You don't understand, and I can't help you understand.

If you had said "nearly severing the aorta" or "nearly damaging the aorta" you would be right, but you didn't.
[Reply]