Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Hate:
Sutton's shitty, soft "numbers" defenses should never be held up as a positive. Ever.
That guy ****ing sucked worse than Reid and isn't even worthy of holding the piss bucket for Marty, Cowher, and Stram to piss in.
THOSE guys knew how to build a defense that ate souls for shits and giggles.
That soft defense hel Brady to what? 10 points? And seattle to 20. 2 super bowl teams. This defense could only dream of doing that.
Yall dont want to admit Sutton had some good defenses because your boomers and want to pretend only good things happened 20 years ago. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Titty Meat:
Btw that 14 defense did that without DJ and Berry for most of the year.
Is that the same defense responsible for the 2nd largest playoff collapse in NFL history? Or did that happen to another one of Sutton's top defenses? I cant remember, its all a blur of suck... [Reply]
Originally Posted by TEX:
Is that the same defense responsible for the 2nd largest playoff collapse in NFL history? Or did that happen to another one of Sutton's top defenses? I cant remember, its all a blur of suck...
That was the year before and that defense had just about everyone get injured. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Titty Meat:
That soft defense hel Brady to what? 10 points? And seattle to 20. 2 super bowl teams. This defense could only dream of doing that.
Yall dont want to admit Sutton had some good defenses because your boomers and want to pretend only good things happened 20 years ago.
Just stop being a dumbass. Oh wait, you cant cuz you're a millennial...
Pay attention to how to spell "you're." You just may learn something. :-) [Reply]
Originally Posted by Titty Meat:
That soft defense hel Brady to what? 10 points? And seattle to 20. 2 super bowl teams. This defense could only dream of doing that.
Yall dont want to admit Sutton had some good defenses because your boomers and want to pretend only good things happened 20 years ago.
His defense flat-out carried this team for a couple years. Crennel's boys carried over what he taught them for a few years.
I haven't forgotten.
They played like warriors to cover a dogshit offense. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Chiefshrink: :-) Paper Tiger defense because we had easier schedules. Once we started winning consistently having to play tougher teams that went away.
The most points we gave up in a single game was 29 to the Broncos and the Seahawks and Patriots were both super bowl teams. That was a legit defense without Berry or Johnson. You guys are being ridiculous because it doesnt fit your narrative [Reply]
Originally Posted by notorious:
His defense flat-out carried this team for a couple years. Crennel's boys carried over what he taught them for a few years.
I haven't forgotten.
They played like warriors to cover a dogshit offense.
Yup. Our team last year goes undefeated if they had a defense like 13,14 or the 2nd half of 15s. [Reply]
Originally Posted by xztop123:
I agree with this. The offense and team in general are heavily dependent on pat nailing those shots. It’s not that we necessarily HAVE to be like that (we did good with a ball control style) it’s just that we’re letting mahomes be the hero so he needs to also deliver. I have no doubts this team would be in a similar position if we were playing a different type of tempo offense.
Also the left tackle is fucking everything up. Once fisher gets back this team changes completely.
Fisher and PENNELL need to be in the fucking game desperately.
The blueprint for beating the chiefs is running the ball and our moronic Coaching staff chose to have one of our best run stuffers inactive against the Titans. :-)
Maybe our run defense wouldn't have gotten so tired if Pennel would have been rotating in and out all game. [Reply]
Originally Posted by PAChiefsGuy:
From what I understand Andy is pretty hands off when it comes to the D. He basically lets the GM and DC do their thing. He will give input here and there but nothing crazy. Reid does like DCs who like to blitz though.
Our D sucks because the players aren't good. It's not scheme. GM is doing a shit job of getting talent for our D. CBs are bad, LBs are bad, Dline is average, Safeties are good but nothing spectacular. There is no way any DC can fix that.
In order to stop the run consistently, our dline and LBs have to win their one-on-one battles. There is no way around it and right now our players are not doing it.
What the **** are you blathering about?
Andy Reid IS the GM. He ran Dorsey and Ballard out of town and promoted his yes-man Veach, who does exactly what Reid tells him. [Reply]
Originally Posted by TEX:
Is that the same defense responsible for the 2nd largest playoff collapse in NFL history? Or did that happen to another one of Sutton's top defenses? I cant remember, its all a blur of suck...
It was Andy Reid and his 7 second half rushing attempts with an Alex Smith-led offense.
