Originally Posted by old_geezer:
It's time to put the blame where it belongs; on the defensive coaches and philosophy. Seems every "fix" we sign or trade for comes to the Chiefs and immediately plays worse than they did for their previous team. That can't all be on the players. Andy needs to start paying attention to the DC and the job he's (not) doing.
Originally Posted by The Franchise:
This take is borderline retarded.
Well you can't argue that they've both had many many many embarrassing failures of their respective squads. Or are you suggesting that the rankings under Spags shows some kind of serious improvement?
I mean, I get the emotion to want Spags to be better than a fuckwad like Sutton, but our rankings haven't shown that he is.
Originally Posted by TEX:
Exactly the case. EVERYONE expected the Natti to suck, even themselves. However, NOBODY expected the Chiefs to be as bad as they are. Probably the most disappointing team in the league, when you consider the expectations.
I disagree. Toughest schedule in the league, multiple major injuries on both sides of the ball, and they're still in position to win the division.
The Falcons are by far the most disappointing team in the league. I'd say that the Rams, Cowboys, Eagles, Browns, Chargers, and Bears have been more disappointing than the Chiefs. [Reply]
It is no wonder this _efense is pathetic: if an opposing RB can get past the DL, they have a free shot at a DB or simply open space to the end zone. These slugs are slow, out of position, and piss-poor tacklers. A pathetic, slow, weak-ass LB corps = worst in the league (with exception of 0'fer Cincy) _efense.
The only time this team looks decent, defensively, is when they blitz. IMO it is because the LB already has an assigned lane and goal. If we make them think, i.e. read & react, we're doomed. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Mama Hip Rockets:
I disagree. Toughest schedule in the league, multiple major injuries on both sides of the ball, and they're still in position to win the division.
The Falcons are by far the most disappointing team in the league. I'd say that the Rams, Cowboys, Eagles, Browns, Chargers, and Bears have been more disappointing than the Chiefs.
Gee... Ok then the Chiefs are the 8th most disappointing team in the league. :-) [Reply]
Originally Posted by Pasta Giant Meatball:
12-4,but depends on what games get influenced
First off, we aren't winning out and we all know that...secondly, stopped with this "influenced" shit...makes you instantly have zero credibility. [Reply]