So how does a man deserving of these adjectives, who has coached for two decades plus, guiding now two separate franchises to host a hat trick of title games not understand that exposing the very reason your team transcends all others is UNFATHOMABLY stupid?
3rd n 1. Big bruising back in the game playing well. Best arm on the planet running the offense. Lets not hand it off though, let's call a designed run exposing our qb to a free shot that gets his head ripped off.
Why?
Mahomes isn't going to back off from the call, and the guy puts a bullseye on his back enough with his own scrambles down field. Its YOUR JOB to protect your quarterback.
Why the fuck are you calling designed qb running plays? He was already dinged and limping around. You cannot honestly believe that THIS was the only way you could get one yard on this trash defense.
15 is the reason KC is favored in every contest.
15 covers MANY of your warts as a play caller and time manager.
15 is the guy who saved your coaching legacy, bringing you a championship that eluded you for years, because your other quarterbacks could not overcome your post season pant shitting.
Why you choose to put 15 in harms way intentionally is beyond any sane line of thinking. It isnt like you have an o line that can protect him. You have a former #1 and a bunch of JAGS up front trying their best to just not look like a retard trying to fuck a doorknob.
Every time he drops back, he has to run for his life already, so to just throw him into the teeth of the defense, intentionally, is simply unfathomably stupid.
Take a look at your incredible 3 point performance in the second half against the terrible Browns defense. That's how far an innovative, guru genius like you is going to get with Chad fucking Henne.
Originally Posted by Superturtle:
Feel free to point out where anybody said only the IOL is an issue. Maybe back before the Schwartz injury that was a thing, but not recently.
Dude, there's literally thousands of posts in the last 6 months bitching about Wylie and Reiter. If you go to the draft forum right now, people are talking about Wylie and Reiter.
Every weekend, the #1 target on the offensive line for bitching is Wylie. It's always Wylie, before and after the Schwartz thing.
Seriously, not sure why this is even an argument. There are tons of people here that still feel the IOL is the biggest problem on the offense. Saw a couple of posts about it this morning. [Reply]
Originally Posted by htismaqe:
Yeah and their starters were:
LT Joe Staley - 1st round pick of the 49ers in 2007
LG Laken Tomlinson - former 1st round pick cut by the Lions, made just over $4M last year
C Mike Person - 7th round pick of the 49ers in 2011
RG Ben Garland - UDFA, played for 3 different teams, made about $1M last year
RT Mike McGlinchey - 1st round pick of the 49ers in 2018
See a pattern there?
Mike fucking Person. Good grief, that guy sucked in KC. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Superturtle:
Have you seen the pattern where one of our OTs is on the brink of retirement and the other may not be too far behind him?
Why would Fisher even remotely entertain retirement? [Reply]
Originally Posted by htismaqe:
Dude, there's literally thousands of posts in the last 6 months bitching about Wylie and Reiter. If you go to the draft forum right now, people are talking about Wylie and Reiter.
Every weekend, the #1 target on the offensive line for bitching is Wylie. It's always Wylie, before and after the Schwartz thing.
Seriously, not sure why this is even an argument. There are tons of people here that still feel the IOL is the biggest problem on the offense. Saw a couple of posts about it this morning.
As I've said for well over a year now: Reiter is playing really well. Period. If a great IOL comes available, draft/sign him. But, until he is a FA, Reiter does not HAVE to be replaced. Certainly not by a guy like Kilgore. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla:
As I've said for well over a year now: Reiter is playing really well. Period. If a great IOL comes available, draft/sign him. But, until he is a FA, Reiter does not HAVE to be replaced. Certainly not by a guy like Kilgore.
Originally Posted by Superturtle:
Reiter is an UFA after the season.
I was wondering if that wasn't the case. He's no Hudson or Morse, but I'd hate to see us lose another quality center, even if Chief Fan doesn't like him for whatever dumbass reason. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla:
I was wondering if that wasn't the case. He's no Hudson or Morse, but I'd hate to see us lose another quality center, even if Chief Fan doesn't like him for whatever dumbass reason.
There would be an epic meltdown if the Chiefs were to re-sign Reiter this offseason.
Can we get this thread back on track? There is a race going her between some really moronic posters and right now, as they make the turn, it's a fucking horse race.
I want to see who is going to break the tape at the end, and instead, here we are mucking it up with real fucking discussion.
There will probably be a lot of bitching no matter what they do with Reiter. It's the nature of CP.
You have to wonder if he will come back or if someone else will pay him. It will certainly let us know what the rest of the league thinks of him vs. the rep he's got here. [Reply]
Originally Posted by htismaqe:
There will probably be a lot of bitching no matter what they do with Reiter. It's the nature of CP.
You have to wonder if he will come back or if someone else will pay him. It will certainly let us know what the rest of the league thinks of him vs. the rep he's got here.
That's because people here just can't seem to grasp the concept that you can't pay a QB $40 million and a couple of receivers $16 million each, a Tight End $12 million, a defensive tackle $20 million, a defensive end $20 million and a safety $14 million, yet still have enough money leftover to pay each offensive lineman $10 to $20 million.
The Chiefs will continue to go "dumpster diving" on all of their interior line positions because they just don't have the cap in order to sign three or four guys to huge contracts. [Reply]
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud:
That's because people here just can't seem to grasp the concept that you can't pay a QB $40 million and a couple of receivers $16 million each, a Tight End $12 million, a defensive tackle $20 million, a defensive end $20 million and a safety $14 million, yet still have enough money leftover to pay each offensive lineman $10 to $20 million.
The Chiefs will continue to go "dumpster diving" on all of their interior line positions because they just don't have the cap in order to sign three or four guys to huge contracts.
A lot of teams do that. Tackle is a premium position. Other than that, the offensive line is just down the priority list in terms of expenditures. Teams that spend big bucks on interior line end up with messes like the Steelers now have. [Reply]
Originally Posted by htismaqe:
A lot of teams do that. Tackle is a premium position. Other than that, the offensive line is just down the priority list in terms of expenditures. Teams that spend big bucks on interior line end up with messes like the Steelers now have.
Steelers would be in this mess regardless of how much they spent on the interior line. It's usually what happens when your franchise QB regresses to this extent. [Reply]
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud:
That's because people here just can't seem to grasp the concept that you can't pay a QB $40 million and a couple of receivers $16 million each, a Tight End $12 million, a defensive tackle $20 million, a defensive end $20 million and a safety $14 million, yet still have enough money leftover to pay each offensive lineman $10 to $20 million.
The Chiefs will continue to go "dumpster diving" on all of their interior line positions because they just don't have the cap in order to sign three or four guys to huge contracts.
It is indeed a challenge, but to say we can't grasp the concept is not only wrong, it's rather arrogant. [Reply]
