I think you can find quality linemen in later rounds. Use a second rounder for a skill position. There are way more Jason Kelces in the 6th than Tyreek Hills in the 5th [Reply]
Originally Posted by Kiimosabi:
I think you can find quality linemen in later rounds. Use a second rounder for a skill position. There are way more Jason Kelces in the 6th than Tyreek Hills in the 5th
It’s about time this team invests a day 2 pick on the IOL.
We need a Morse/Hudson in the worst way. When you invest a 1st rounder on a RB, it makes sense to invest an early pick on the OL too if you want to get the most out of said RB (and protect the biggest investment of all). [Reply]
Originally Posted by Kiimosabi:
I think you can find quality linemen in later rounds. Use a second rounder for a skill position. There are way more Jason Kelces in the 6th than Tyreek Hills in the 5th
LB is not a skill position.
Furthermore, they just spent a 2nd rounder on a LB.
They need WR, IOL, maybe another tackle, a TE, and so many other things. [Reply]
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud:
No one is paying the guy more than $3 million per and he'll be lucky to get $2 million per with incentives.
He's missed 13 games and counting in the past 3 seasons and has 1,487 yards and 8 TD's during that span.
The Chiefs have invested at least $40 million into Watkins so far, which is $5 million per TD or $26,900 dollars per yard.
Right. So what I'm asking is, do we anticipate Veach offering a team-friendly deal to Watkins, and if so, do we anticipate Watkins accepting a team-friendly deal?
At some point there has to be a cost-benefit of keeping Watkins for his familiarity with the offense. So, what is that, and does Veach offer it, and does Watkins accept? [Reply]