Sources: The #Seahawks and #Chiefs are deep in talks on a trade to send star Frank Clark to KC. The compensation would include a 1st rounder, a 2020 2nd rounder and a swap of mid-rounders. To complete it, the franchise tagged player and Chiefs must hammer out a deal.
Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Hate:
How the **** is it wrong to want to see our management get better compensation in trade-outs???
What the **** is WRONG with some of you? I swear to God some of you are like little kids who get a new toy and don't even think about what mom and dad had to pay for it, or if they had to work overtime and skip some lunches to buy it for you!
**** me.
I have to laugh if you think getting a 2nd for Peters and Ford was “bad value”. [Reply]
Originally Posted by jspchief:
Think it would have taken this much to get Peterson? Who would have preferred Peterson over Clark?
I'd be ecstatic about this trade if it were for Patrick Peterson.
I value secondary more than DE
I don't think sacks win games
PP is a shutdown corner
I don't have to read more DV crap on Twitter every time the Chiefs score
edit:
Originally Posted by Mecca:
Peterson is like 5 years older...remember that.
I admit I didn't consider this before posting, though. [Reply]
Effort? Clark versus the #Chiefs is backside DE. He is still chasing Williams 20 yards down field to get a pursuit angle on him and force him out of bounds. That’s has been lacking on KC for awhile at that position. #JacobsEyeInTheSkypic.twitter.com/RpyVBNsWYu
Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Hate:
You two are just short-sighted and don't understand the nuanced dynamics of our brilliant GM/pants-shitting hype parade.
DUDE. We just got an elite all around DE that is literally a perfect fit for our new 4-3 defense. Have you watched his film at all? Have you watched him just throw Fisher into Mahomes?
For a #29 and a late 2020 2nd pick, we just got a 25 year old elite DE. For less on average than we would've paid Houston this year.
What the fuck is wrong with you?
He's a STUD. He's better than anyone we could've drafted. If we'd have traded up for like NICK BOSA maybe, and we would've had to give up a LOT more to go get him.
Originally Posted by Titty Meat:
I'm in Mexico right now but this is a terrible trade. Veach basically traded for a 1 year window. it's a fireable offense.
Amazing. Everything you just said is wrong. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Hate:
How the fuck is it wrong to want to see our management get better compensation in trade-outs???
What the fuck is WRONG with some of you? I swear to God some of you are like little kids who get a new toy and don't even think about what mom and dad had to pay for it, or if they had to work overtime and skip some lunches to buy it for you!
Fuck me.
Weren't you the guy who was just so deliriously excited and optimistic because we had hired some highly regarded ***assistant*** defensive coaches?
High highs and low lows in the SDH world, I guess. I'm willing to be more excited about actual talent on our defense than those who will coach them. [Reply]
that kind of shit gets me excited for this, he looks strong out there. Nobody likes the $100 mill deal but if we just have a top 15 defense it's Superbowl time, hopefully all of the talent we added in FA and whatever we get in the draft can get us there. [Reply]
