Originally Posted by kcpasco:
Clark just needs to loosen his panties and not give a ****. The guy is seriously retarded when it comes to public opinion. But he was raised wealthy.
Exactly. The Pats, Skins, and Browns have all went ahead and recruited controversial players and gave zero fucks. They got a little bit of shit for it (Skins got a lot but Skins always catch shit no matter what). We as an organization need these kind of balls. The NFL doesn't give a shit about a player's character, they only pretend to. It's a cut-throat bizz and we need to get cut-throat if we wanna stay at the top. Keep Hill damit.
Originally Posted by BlackOp:
Yeah..sorry to all those SJW that jerk off to images of Hill putting his cigarettes out on his child's forehead...must suck when reality contradicts your media driven fantasy world.
You are sheep and always will be...directed by something as simple as a bell...ding ding ..over here....ding ding...over here.
of course they are completely oblivious of the ritual..and will worship whatever the crowd demands.
Seeing that the authorities are pretty strongly hinting there's a lot more info out there that they don't want to release pending investigation, this is going to be a long month. It's really only delaying the inevitable.
Originally Posted by Warrick:
I must have missed the part where Tyreek is actual admitting punching his 3 yr old child in the chest. Are we just taking her word for it now?
Well, seeing as she's an admitted liar, I don't believe a fucking word she says.
Originally Posted by bigjosh:
He cant remain on the team because its a huge distraction that will be going on all ****ing year. Its like the eric berry situation last year but worse.
Originally Posted by BlackOp:
Not only that...but was punching him the chest a vicious act...with reckless intent to injure? None of us know exactly what that meant..but sure as shit form the worst possible scenario in our minds.
Did he experience broken ribs?.. Did Hill knock him five feet across the room? Who ****ing knows...his girl set him up.
And think..If Hill was punching his 3 year old as hard as he could..not only would that kill him...but why would she not report it and file a restraining order? If a girl was punching my child in the chest..and wanting to injure him..she would be gone.
This isn't adding up..
It's weird... you get more bent out of shape about cap violations and that sort of thing than you do one of these guys potentially doing something terrible to another person.
There's no doubt that Hill and this woman are a toxic mess and should not be with each other, but that shouldn't absolve him from any blame in what has happened over the course of their relationship.
My hope is that neither of them regains custody of the kid...
Originally Posted by Mile High Mania:
It's weird... you get more bent out of shape about cap violations and that sort of thing than you do one of these guys potentially doing something terrible to another person.
There's no doubt that Hill and this woman are a toxic mess and should not be with each other, but that shouldn't absolve him from any blame in what has happened over the course of their relationship.
My hope is that neither of them regains custody of the kid...
All we know is that :
She lied about what happened
And
Tyreek has maintained his innocence
That's it.
That recorded conversation? She was baiting him.
I don't understand why everyone thinks it's some smoking gun, when she's a liar who's probably either lying outright, at best...and at worst, is exaggerating and making stuff up to twist it around, at worst.
I mean, if Tyreek Hill NFL superstar and workout maven, had punched his 3 year old child in the chest in the manner she suggests, the child would have sustained injuries far worse than a broken arm - the kid would've died.
Because she's an admitted liar, I have to assume she's lying about EVERYTHING.
When Tyreek says that she's been ****ing other dudes we don't know that her lying ass hasn't been ****ing other dudes, having the 3 year old call them "daddy", and some of her side dick mother****ers didn't do the abuse, ya know.
Far fetched, but the only thing we KNOW is that she's a liar and the JoCo DFS found signs of abuse, but don't know who to charge.
Originally Posted by BleedingRed:
Wrong DFS does that exact thing plenty of times, not only that they leave kids in abusive homes all the time.
Sure, but given that the child was removed from the home by child services and the DA thinks a crime was committed and observed what he thought were clear signs of abuse, how likely is it that they just happened to get that completely wrong?