ChiefsPlanet Mobile
Page 3 of 272
< 123 45671353103 > Last »
Washington DC and The Holy Land>****2020 Donald Trump re-election campaign thread****
Hammock Parties 08:19 PM 02-11-2019
Eight stars for eight years.

YUUUUUGE rally in El Paso tonight.

It looks like Beto only has 900 guests at his so called March, tiny! We have over 35000 in attendance. 8000 inside and tens of thousands in the parking lot and streets. @realDonaldTrump had 70,000+ RSVPs and thousands couldn’t make it. #winning

— Brad Parscale (@parscale) February 12, 2019




[Reply]
BucEyedPea 09:57 PM 02-11-2019
Originally Posted by Bowser:
I still say he's just going to have the Army Corps of Engineers ultimately build it. Plus, he'd have all the money he needed if he went that route with that fat military budget. And since he'd be using the military, I really don't think the Dems could block it (not sure on that one, though).
Then he can interdict by going into the caravan-creating countries to stop them from
starting them right there on the spot. That would put us at war with the UN too, who is another entity behind this crap. Look for all those blue and white UN booths set up amidst them.
[Reply]
BucEyedPea 10:00 PM 02-11-2019
Will 2020 a Repeat of 1972?

Dick Morris thinks so.



[Reply]
GloryDayz 10:04 PM 02-11-2019
Originally Posted by Hammock Parties:
:-):-):-):-):-):-)
[Reply]
cosmo20002 10:06 PM 02-11-2019
Originally Posted by BucEyedPea:
Will 2020 a Repeat of 1972?

Dick Morris thinks so.


:-) at the mentality of someone thinking, "Oooh Dick Morris...lemme go post this!"
[Reply]
Hammock Parties 10:07 PM 02-11-2019
His analysis is spot on.
[Reply]
cosmo20002 10:10 PM 02-11-2019
Originally Posted by Hammock Parties:
His analysis is spot on.
Didn't listen to it...repeat of 1972...re-elect a president who will later resign in disgrace?
[Reply]
Hammock Parties 10:12 PM 02-11-2019
Originally Posted by cosmo20002:
Didn't listen to it...repeat of 1972...re-elect a president who will later resign in disgrace?
In 1972 the Democrats decided not to run their centrist candidate who had lost previously in favor of going hard left.

And got BTFO.

Doesn't matter what Nixon did after...he won...because the Democratic strategy was fatally flawed.
[Reply]
cosmo20002 10:28 PM 02-11-2019
Originally Posted by Hammock Parties:
In 1972 the Democrats decided not to run their centrist candidate who had lost previously in favor of going hard left.

And got BTFO.

Doesn't matter what Nixon did after...he won...because the Democratic strategy was fatally flawed.
:-) Comparisons to anything more than 3-4 elections ago are pretty much always ridiculous. Pat Buchanan used to always have columns like that....WILL THE DEMOCRATS REPEAT THEIR MISTAKES OF 1904????:-)
[Reply]
Munson 10:48 PM 02-11-2019

��Happening Now: @realDonaldTrump overflow crowd in El Paso, Texas.... pic.twitter.com/kqyDC66qRA

— Dan Scavino (@DanScavino) February 12, 2019


[Reply]
LiveSteam 11:51 PM 02-11-2019
Originally Posted by Munson:

Cosmo :-)
[Reply]
stumppy 07:41 AM 02-12-2019
Originally Posted by Hammock Parties:
Eight stars for eight years.

YUUUUUGE rally in El Paso tonight.




:-)
[Reply]
Prison Bitch 07:47 AM 02-12-2019
He will have trouble convincing his core voters to vote for him again, we didn’t want Pentagon overspending or tax cuts for elites or more immigration. Those are huge “no no’s” that he’s done nothing to stop - so really, he has nothing to run on.


There’s a tiny portion of the base that beats off to Israel so he will get those votes obv, but again, that’s like 3% of the electorate.
[Reply]
GloryDayz 01:06 PM 02-12-2019
Originally Posted by Prison Bitch:
He will have trouble convincing his core voters to vote for him again, we didn’t want Pentagon overspending or tax cuts for elites or more immigration. Those are huge “no no’s” that he’s done nothing to stop - so really, he has nothing to run on.


There’s a tiny portion of the base that beats off to Israel so he will get those votes obv, but again, that’s like 3% of the electorate.


It was hardly overspending, it was finally getting it right.

And hell yes "we" wanted lots and lot of spending on the military. We wanted it BADLY!!!
[Reply]
HonestChieffan 01:09 PM 02-12-2019
Originally Posted by Prison Bitch:
He will have trouble convincing his core voters to vote for him again, we didn’t want Pentagon overspending or tax cuts for elites or more immigration. Those are huge “no no’s” that he’s done nothing to stop - so really, he has nothing to run on.


There’s a tiny portion of the base that beats off to Israel so he will get those votes obv, but again, that’s like 3% of the electorate.


That may be you worst ever take. You need to frame this one.
[Reply]
Trolly McTrollson 01:15 PM 02-12-2019
Originally Posted by Prison Bitch:
He will have trouble convincing his core voters to vote for him again, we didn’t want Pentagon overspending or tax cuts for elites or more immigration. Those are huge “no no’s” that he’s done nothing to stop - so really, he has nothing to run on.


There’s a tiny portion of the base that beats off to Israel so he will get those votes obv, but again, that’s like 3% of the electorate.
LOL, he’ll just lie about all of his incredible accomplishments and his base of illiterate suckers will all fall for it.
[Reply]
Page 3 of 272
< 123 45671353103 > Last »
Up