Chiefs ****The Clyde Edwards-Helaire Thread***** - Page 113

[Reply]

Originally Posted by htismaqe:
Never thought about it until now but I wonder if the whole Ingram/Dobbins dynamic has a chance to cause issues?

Ingram was supposed to be the main back and he still got most of the carries. But between sharing carries with Jackson and them giving Dobbins the more scoring opportunities, I wonder...

I can't fathom Dobbins playing 2nd fiddle for very long there. He's too dynamic of a player IMO.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by KChiefs1:

The thing is, RPOs are going to be stupid effective. Even on that zone give, Kelce was wide open.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by UChieffyBugger:
I'LL ASK YOU AGAIN BECAUSE OBVIOUSLY YOU'RE SO FREAKING DUMB YOU CANNOT FATHOM BASIC ENGLISH...IF I SAID WHAT YOU'RE CLAIMING I SAID..THEN WHY DON'T YOU SHOW ME YOU LYING COWARD?!!....I DARE YOU TO PRESENT THE POSTS WHERE I MOANED ABOUT CEH AND BIGGED UP TAYLOR FOR "PAGES AND PAGES"...COME ON PRICK LETS SEE HOW BRAVE YOU ARE :-) .

SAY THAT TO MY FACE, FUCKER, NOT ONLINE, SEE WHAT HAPPENS!
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Simply Red:
SAY THAT TO MY FACE, ****ER, NOT ONLINE, SEE WHAT HAPPENS!

LOL THANK YOU FOR MAKING ME GIGGLE :-)
[Reply]

Originally Posted by TwistedChief:
And you just know his greatest value is in the passing game and Andy is keeping that under wraps for the Ravens.

You are so right.......:-)
[Reply]

Good vibes in here. I would like to shout out a MOTHER FUCKER TO EVERYONE! Let the hate flow! Thats what we need man baby!
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Pants:
Yeah. The foot-speed is beyond elite. Whatever the next level after elite is.

It�s Mahomes.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
[Reply]

Originally Posted by crispystl420:
It�s Mahomes.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Average -- Good -- Great -- Elite -- Mahomes

Yeah, I'll allow it.

Dude's footwork and contact balance are just flat out Mahomes.
[Reply]

Love me some CEH,.

But just humor me for a second. Imagine what this offense would be if you dropped the 2013 version of Jamal Charles in it. Him in the backfield running those RPO's and in this offense with the screen game?

Shit.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by O.city:
Love me some CEH,.

But just humor me for a second. Imagine what this offense would be if you dropped the 2013 version of Jamal Charles in it. Him in the backfield running those RPO's and in this offense with the screen game?

Shit.

Would rather have Clyde. Love Jamaal but he fumbled a lot
[Reply]

Originally Posted by RunKC:
Would rather have Clyde. Love Jamaal but he fumbled a lot

Well this is certainly a strong take...
[Reply]

Originally Posted by RunKC:
Would rather have Clyde. Love Jamaal but he fumbled a lot

Log out.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by ThaVirus:
Log out.

I figured he'd have taken at least a cold shower between Thursday and now.

I mean damn. Dude looked great but....lord. Prime Charles was literally the most efficient RB in NFL HISTORY and combined CEH's pass-catching skills with Tyreek Hill's speed.

I mean...well, like I said, it's certainly a strong take.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by RunKC:
Would rather have Clyde. Love Jamaal but he fumbled a lot

via GIPHY

[Reply]