Chiefs Veach's '21 Offseason Plan to Keep Us Thriving: Let's speculate - Page 129

In order to prevent us wasting precious years of Patrick Mahomes' career, Veach needs to work some magic this offseason. What's your advice for him?
[Reply]

Originally Posted by O.city:
I wouldn’t put much stock into what they say. Let actions determine

Exactly. Nothing they say now really matters at all.
[Reply]

Fish and Schwartz back by week 1? LFGGGG
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Dante84:
Fish and Schwartz back by week 1? LFGGGG

I actually don't welcome that update. Sounds a lot like Chiefs denial. They need to confront reality.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by wazu:
I actually don't welcome that update. Sounds a lot like Chiefs denial. They need to confront reality.

:-)

Good news means they're deluded.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by wazu:
I actually don't welcome that update. Sounds a lot like Chiefs denial. They need to confront reality.

Lol wut
[Reply]

Originally Posted by htismaqe:
:-)

Good news means they're deluded.

Torn achilles ready for camp? Is there any record of any player ever coming back from torn achilles in 6 months?
[Reply]

Originally Posted by wazu:
Torn achilles ready for camp? Is there any record of any player ever coming back from torn achilles in 6 months?

Suggs came back in 5 months. So yes.
[Reply]

And for the record.....he said expect them back by camp. I don’t think he meant full participants.
[Reply]

Wasn’t Suggs a partial tear?
[Reply]

Football is a business. The Chiefs don't deal in "hope" nor does any other team.

If they say they'll be back is because they have objective evidence that they can be. Doesn't mean they WILL be but they're not just going to come out and say they'll be back if it doesn't look like they can be.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by O.city:
Wasn’t Suggs a partial tear?

Do we know the extent of Fisher's injury, in reality?
[Reply]

Originally Posted by htismaqe:
Football is a business. The Chiefs don't deal in "hope" nor does any other team.

If they say they'll be back is because they have objective evidence that they can be. Doesn't mean they WILL be but they're not just going to come out and say they'll be back if it doesn't look like they can be.

Whether it's hope or optimism, my main concern is the Chiefs approach this offseason under the assumption they need two OTs that can start Week 1 who are not named Eric Fisher or Mitchell Schwartz.
[Reply]

Sounds like mathieu is about to be extended

Also they aren’t looking at a qb in this draft
[Reply]

Wouldn't mind paying some solid coin for a good backup qb.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by wazu:
Whether it's hope or optimism, my main concern is the Chiefs approach this offseason under the assumption they need two OTs that can start Week 1 who are not named Eric Fisher or Mitchell Schwartz.

They're not going to get two new starting tackles this offseason. Don't get your hopes up.
[Reply]