So he admits he’s chasing a ring.

Yeah, KC makes a ton of sense. Would alleviate the need to reach for an OT. I wouldn’t sign him until after the draft probably though. If your BPA is an OT in the first couple rounds, won’t need him.
[Reply]

The Eagles have acknowledged they’re now in a retooling phase and there’s no way they can justify bringing back a 39-year-old left tackle who has struggled to stay on the field. Peters is one of the greatest players in franchise history but it’s obviously time to move on and Peters knows it too.

This guys is older than dirt/ Pass
[Reply]

He’s going to be on this team. It’s not even a question. His quote may as well have been “See you at camp, Andy! I love BBQ and winning!”
[Reply]

Older than dirt but will also be dirt cheap.

He’ll be here.
[Reply]

Yeah, we need another OT on injured reserve.
[Reply]

He's old and not good and injury prone. He'd be a disaster starter
[Reply]

You are aware Mike Remmers is about to start a Super Bowl at left tackle?

Jason Peters wouldn’t be worth having on this team on a minimal deal?

Interesting point of view.
[Reply]

Nah fam

https://youtu.be/g1teqD5QLjY
[Reply]

Good fucking grief
[Reply]

If we have 3 good ones, what are the chances 2 of the 3 are healthy for the playoffs?

That’s what you’re shooting for.
[Reply]

Good grief, no.

Offensive line play, more than any unit in football, is dependent on reps and cohesion. You don't want to be shuffling pieces every other week because of injuries.
[Reply]

You realize we don't have to choose between the two next year right?

And no, he wouldn't be worth having. He's old shitty and broken.
[Reply]

It's like we learned nothing from the Sammy Watkins experience.
[Reply]

Thanks for your usual brilliant input.

Let me save you some time; you’re smarter than me, you have connections, and nobody cares.

Feel free to stop replying.
[Reply]