Originally Posted by kgrund:
You are missing the point. The Chiefs having been trying like heck to distance from any association with Indian tribes, which Kingdom fits the bill.
I don't think the word "nation" is going to make the difference here, although in today's snowflake driven cancel society anything is possible...
[Reply]
Originally Posted by Hammock Parties:
They would if they could. We do, and we are!!!
No they wouldn't and it's as stupid as our mascot
[Reply]
Originally Posted by FlaChief58:
No they wouldn't and it's as stupid as our mascot
The indians were savages who fought amongst each other and never united to become a kingdom.
But they would if they could!!!!!!!!
WE DID AND WE ARE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
THE GREAT CHIEFS KINGDOM WITH THE KING MAHOMES SITTING ON THE THRONE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
WE SWEAR FEALTY AND LOVE TO OUR GREAT KING!!!! PATRICK MAHOMES!!! GKIOMG OF THE KIOGNDOM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
[Reply]
Originally Posted by Hammock Parties:
The indians were savages who fought amongst each other and never united to become a kingdom.
But they would if they could!!!!!!!!
WE DID AND WE ARE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
THE GREAT CHIEFS KINGDOM WITH THE KING MAHOMES SITTING ON THE THRONE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
WE SWEAR FEALTY AND LOVE TO OUR GREAT KING!!!! PATRICK MAHOMES!!! GKIOMG OF THE KIOGNDOM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Lol, you're such a child...
[Reply]