Originally Posted by O.city:
Problem it seems with WR's that high is that they're pretty dependent on the QB and teams drafting that high usually suck at QB.
Unless they're just freaks like Hopkins who could catch passes from Pestilence for TD"S.
Pretty sure I'm a better QB than Tom Savage. You? Not so much. [Reply]
Originally Posted by O.city:
Problem it seems with WR's that high is that they're pretty dependent on the QB and teams drafting that high usually suck at QB.
Unless they're just freaks like Hopkins who could catch passes from Pestilence for TD"S.
That’s a fair point. I think the problem with OBJ is he’s a fucking diva in every sense of the word. On the field he’s been fantastic. [Reply]
Originally Posted by staylor26:
That’s a fair point. I think the problem with OBJ is he’s a ****ing Diva in every sense of the word. On the field he’s been fantastic.
I think the biggest portion of these dudes that play at that level are divas. [Reply]
I have to decide whether to keep Tyreek Hill or Hopkins for my fantasy team and what I'm really deciding is if I believe in Mahomes or Watson more and this decision is killing me.
Also the fact that I'm leaning Hopkins is making me nauseous. [Reply]
Why would the Giants commit to Eli for 2 more years but then get rid of his best weapon. What is the point of keeping Eli for 2 years if you are going to rebuild while you do it? [Reply]
Originally Posted by NJChiefsFan:
Why would the Giants commit to Eli for 2 more years but then get rid of his best weapon. What is the point of keeping Eli for 2 years if you are going to rebuild while you do it?
Originally Posted by NJChiefsFan:
Why would the Giants commit to Eli for 2 more years but then get rid of his best weapon. What is the point of keeping Eli for 2 years if you are going to rebuild while you do it?
Same reason the Chiefs would trade Peters.
If they don't want to resign him to a mega deal maybe? [Reply]