Today at 3:00, Steve will be holding a press conference regarding the criminal investigation involving Tyreek Hill and Crystal Espinal. This will be held in our 4th floor conference room.
Originally Posted by TEX:
I know, right? Pretty funny that he and others think that they are. And the deal is, the more posts they have, the more they're convinced. :-)
:-) it's a joke man. They know absolutely nothing more than the rest if us. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Red Dawg:
I thought about that as well. DA I think crossed the line with his remarks. He basicly said the boy was injured and one of the parents did it. Then says the records will be sealed. He sure made it public knowledge. Those remarks affect Hills life a lot. He should sue their ass.
Absolutely. The DA can't decline to press charges, then defame, and not have consequences. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Pasta Giant Meatball:
Why should he get suspended at this point? That's a bullshit statement unless they can prove he did it or lied about something ...
Originally Posted by MAHOMO 4 LIFE!:
I believe Hill is cooperating with the NFL. His 100 mil dollar deal himges on his cooperation. He’s innocent and has nothing to hide. Still believe the parents are the ones at fault here
Originally Posted by Pasta Giant Meatball:
Why should he get suspended at this point? That's a bullshit statement unless they can prove he did it or lied about something ...
Originally Posted by Pasta Giant Meatball:
Why should he get suspended at this point? That's a bullshit statement unless they can prove he did it or lied about something ...
Rapoport said NFL was I’ll not make a decision on Hill till the CPS investigation concludes along with the Chiefs extending him. Basically if CPS finds no wrongdoing, Hill will be a Chief for life and no suspension [Reply]
Originally Posted by Red Dawg:
I thought about that as well. DA I think crossed the line with his remarks. He basicly said the boy was injured and one of the parents did it. Then says the records will be sealed. He sure made it public knowledge. Those remarks affect Hills life a lot. He should sue their ass.
He did not basically say one of the parents did it. There were "other" names listed on the complaint. He said he has reason to believe a crime had been committed and that he cant bring charges to anyone. That doesnt mean he believes Hill or his wife did the deed but you can assume that the whole truth isnt being told about how the boy was injured. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Red Dawg:
I thought about that as well. DA I think crossed the line with his remarks. He basicly said the boy was injured and one of the parents did it. Then says the records will be sealed. He sure made it public knowledge. Those remarks affect Hills life a lot. He should sue their ass.
A prerequisite for proving they made defamatory statements about him would be proving that the statements are false. That would require bringing the sealed information into the case to prove that no crime was committed. Do you think that would be productive for the Hill camp? [Reply]
Originally Posted by jd1020:
He did not basically say one of the parents did it. There were "other" names listed on the complaint. He said he has reason to believe a crime had been committed and that he cant bring charges to anyone. That doesnt mean he believes Hill or his wife did the deed but you can assume that the whole truth isnt being told about how the boy was injured.
I do find some of the timing interesting. We know there was a broken arm in January from a picture of him in a cast. But the 2 complaints that were filed were both in early March. I would expect that the cast was off by then so something else must have occurred to generate those complaints. As to what that may have been, we have no idea.
I honestly do not think this is directly due to anything Tyreek did. I think it was someone else in the picture whether Crystal or her parents, or someone else. I expect that what this will mean in the long run is that Tyreek and Crystal (I hope I am spelling that right!) will need to go through some parenting classes and DCS will have regular check up visits for 6 months to a year. As long as all of that goes well this will be over. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Eleazar:
A prerequisite for proving they made defamatory statements about him would be proving that the statements are false. That would require bringing the sealed information into the case to prove that no crime was committed. Do you think that would be productive for the Hill camp?
Originally Posted by Eleazar:
Keep telling yourself that
Are you for real, man? You've done NOTHING but judge. Meanwhile, srvy has kept an open mind, has demonstrated that he's not easily swayed by heresay and doesn't want to conclude anything until all the facts are in. You're way off on this one. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Eleazar:
Keep telling yourself that
So you are the Judge and Jury here?
I have never once in any these thread on this Tyreek matter made any judgement whatsoever. I stated I would wait as soon as the facts came out. The facts are No Charges!
You on the other hand have been all over the map and tried and convicted long ago. You tend to pretend you're above us all on morality. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Hydrae:
I do find some of the timing interesting. We know there was a broken arm in January from a picture of him in a cast. But the 2 complaints that were filed were both in early March. I would expect that the cast was off by then so something else must have occurred to generate those complaints. As to what that may have been, we have no idea.
There were multiple police calls to the house and there were injuries on another occasion besides the broken arm. [Reply]
