Originally Posted by :
A 28-year-old Lake Charles-area woman faces a bevy of charges after Louisiana police said she repeatedly had sex with a 13-year-old boy who she met at the Bible camp where she was a teacher/aide.
According to the Sulphur Daily News, Heather Daughdrill initiated the relationship in June and it continued until a complaint was filed in October. After her arrest on November 29, police told the paper that Daughdrill would pick her victim up from school without his parents' knowledge and subject him to sexual encounters. Louisiana cops also reportedly found sexually explicit texts between Daughdrill and her victim.
This is what a male teacher did to avoid being put in jail.
"A prosecutor in Alabama is calling a nearly 40-year-old man's marriage to his 18-year-old former student a "sham" to prevent her from testifying against him in a sex case.
Matthew Shane Wester - a 38-year-old former math teacher and one-time coach for both track and football at an Alabama high school - allegedly had sexual contact with one of his students back in 2014. According to AL.com, prosecutors indicted Wester in January 2015, alleging he "intentionally and knowingly engaged with a male or female student under the age of 19 in sexual contact which was done for the purpose of gratifying the sexual desire of either party, to wit - kissing and spending the night with the victim."
Wester, who was married with a child at the time of the incident, resigned from his teaching position a month after the indictment, AL.com added. Last June, Wester, who divorced his wife a year ago, married the student, who has been identified as 18-year-old Amy Nicole Cox (Cox has previously shared photos of herself and Wester together, including one now widely-shared picture captioned "happily married"). But with the trial against Wester on the horizon at the time of their wedding, authorities are saying the marriage is simply a strategy to stop the teen from testifying against Wester in court - Alabama state law provides married couples with "marital privilege," meaning they can't be forced to testify against each other..."
Originally Posted by Msmith:
This is what a male teacher did to avoid being put in jail.
"A prosecutor in Alabama is calling a nearly 40-year-old man's marriage to his 18-year-old former student a "sham" to prevent her from testifying against him in a sex case.
Matthew Shane Wester - a 38-year-old former math teacher and one-time coach for both track and football at an Alabama high school - allegedly had sexual contact with one of his students back in 2014. According to AL.com, prosecutors indicted Wester in January 2015, alleging he "intentionally and knowingly engaged with a male or female student under the age of 19 in sexual contact which was done for the purpose of gratifying the sexual desire of either party, to wit - kissing and spending the night with the victim."
Wester, who was married with a child at the time of the incident, resigned from his teaching position a month after the indictment, AL.com added. Last June, Wester, who divorced his wife a year ago, married the student, who has been identified as 18-year-old Amy Nicole Cox (Cox has previously shared photos of herself and Wester together, including one now widely-shared picture captioned "happily married"). But with the trial against Wester on the horizon at the time of their wedding, authorities are saying the marriage is simply a strategy to stop the teen from testifying against Wester in court - Alabama state law provides married couples with "marital privilege," meaning they can't be forced to testify against each other..."
Originally Posted by ThaVirus:
I've heard SnapChat stores them in a database somewhere but does a local police force have the authority to demand them to release that kind of information?
You can record them on your phone, but yes, snapchat does keep them for a certain amount of time if you have a search warrant and a criminal matter has happened, no to civil requests. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Coochie liquor:
The ugliest woman at a bar still has a better chance of getting laid at the end of the night than the best looking guy at the bar.
Not quite. But I agree with the sentiment- in general, a woman has little trouble looking to get laid, and our social structure "makes" men almost always have to be the instigator.
There's a reason why bars have promotions like ladies night. It drives in female patrons and a target rich environment drives in more guys to pay normal priced booze.
Not that it's a shocking revelation, but in today’s age, if you are a very good looking guy, it's probably easier for you to get laid than a really unattractive girl. These a the exceptions to the rule, because your average gal can get laid 100x more easily than your average guy. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Anyong Bluth:
Not quite. But I agree with the sentiment- in general, a woman has little trouble looking to get laid, and our social structure "makes" men almost always have to be the instigator.
There's a reason why bars have promotions like ladies night. It drives in female patrons and a target rich environment drives in more guys to pay normal priced booze.
Not that it's a shocking revelation, but in today’s age, if you are a very good looking guy, it's probably easier for you to get laid than a really unattractive girl. These a the exceptions to the rule, because your average gal can get laid 100x more easily than your average guy.
Where do you think the breakeven point is, where the likelihood is equal?
If it a 99% man and a 1% woman? 95 versus 5? 90 versus 10? I'm curious.
If I had to guess, I'd go with about a 94th percentile man versus a 6th percentile woman. I think the likelihood is moving exponentially in different directions as you move from 99 and 1, so I think the lines cross pretty quickly. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Rain Man:
Where do you think the breakeven point is, where the likelihood is equal?
If it a 99% man and a 1% woman? 95 versus 5? 90 versus 10? I'm curious.
If I had to guess, I'd go with about a 94th percentile man versus a 6th percentile woman. I think the likelihood is moving exponentially in different directions as you move from 99 and 1, so I think the lines cross pretty quickly.
I don't think it's a sliding scale, more like a to the power of / exponential degree.
If you are in the 99th, you probably can get laid easier or at least as easy as any woman in the 60th percentile and below,
98 - probably 50th percentile.
97 - 30th percentile,
96 - 25th percentile,
95 - 20th percentile,
94 - 10th percentile
93 - 8th percentile
92 - 5th percentile
91 - 2nd percentile
Of course, the hotter the girl in question, the percentile is nullified by a greater and greater margin. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Msmith:
This is what a male teacher did to avoid being put in jail.
"A prosecutor in Alabama is calling a nearly 40-year-old man's marriage to his 18-year-old former student a "sham" to prevent her from testifying against him in a sex case.
Matthew Shane Wester - a 38-year-old former math teacher and one-time coach for both track and football at an Alabama high school - allegedly had sexual contact with one of his students back in 2014. According to AL.com, prosecutors indicted Wester in January 2015, alleging he "intentionally and knowingly engaged with a male or female student under the age of 19 in sexual contact which was done for the purpose of gratifying the sexual desire of either party, to wit - kissing and spending the night with the victim."
Wester, who was married with a child at the time of the incident, resigned from his teaching position a month after the indictment, AL.com added. Last June, Wester, who divorced his wife a year ago, married the student, who has been identified as 18-year-old Amy Nicole Cox (Cox has previously shared photos of herself and Wester together, including one now widely-shared picture captioned "happily married"). But with the trial against Wester on the horizon at the time of their wedding, authorities are saying the marriage is simply a strategy to stop the teen from testifying against Wester in court - Alabama state law provides married couples with "marital privilege," meaning they can't be forced to testify against each other..."
Originally Posted by Anyong Bluth:
I don't think it's a sliding scale, more like a to the power of / exponential degree.
If you are in the 99th, you probably can get laid easier or at least as easy as any woman in the 60th percentile and below,
98 - probably 50th percentile.
97 - 30th percentile,
96 - 25th percentile,
95 - 20th percentile,
94 - 10th percentile
93 - 8th percentile
92 - 5th percentile
91 - 2nd percentile
Of course, the hotter the girl in question, the percentile is nullified by a greater and greater margin.
I agree with you on the bottom end of your scale, but I'm not so sure about the top. It seems like a woman in the 40th percentile can still get sex in any Arby's or K-Mart or pet store in the country by just asking. I don't think that a 98th percentile man can do that. [Reply]
Originally Posted by :
A 24-year-old elementary school teacher took home the gold from a twerking contest while on vacation in Cabo San Lucas. Unfortunately, her victory came at a cost: her job.
The teacher, identified as "Carla" by English-language newspaper Mexico News Daily, entered a twerking contest at the Mango Deck Restaurant, Bar & Beach Club, a popular vacation spot situated at the southern tip of the Baja California peninsula. With gyrating hips and a shaking booty, Carla out-twerked her competition, winning $260 an the adoration of the drunken crowd.
That's when things got out of control. A video of Carla's jaw-dropping performance was uploaded to Facebook, where it quickly went viral (for obvious reasons). When Carla returned to work at a private elementary school in the Mexican town of Ciudad Obregon after her vacation, the school's principal and lawyers ambushed her with complaints regarding "immoral behavior" and forced her to resign.
“I was singled out as immoral, called immature and a whore,” Carla told Mexican newspaper Reforma. “I’m not doing anything wrong. It’s a dance competition, and participating in it does not define me as a person. I’m not naked or having sex, much less consuming drugs or disrespecting someone.”
According to Reforma, Carla's friend and family aren't going to take this lying down. Her supporters are currently collecting signatures calling for her reinstatement. As they should: even elementary school teachers are allowed to have fun in their private lives without facing the scrutiny of overzealous, puritanical parents. Especially when there's twerking involved.
