ChiefsPlanet Mobile
Page 91 of 163
« First < 41818788899091 92939495101141 > Last »
Nzoner's Game Room>Major Update on Tyreek Hill [old thread, don't freak out]
MAHOMO 4 LIFE! 11:44 AM 04-24-2019

Today at 3:00, Steve will be holding a press conference regarding the criminal investigation involving Tyreek Hill and Crystal Espinal. This will be held in our 4th floor conference room.

— Johnson County KS DA (@JohnsonCoDA) April 24, 2019


From @NFLTotalAccess: The latest on #Chiefs WR Tyreek Hill... pic.twitter.com/5xEpODrhuf

— Ian Rapoport (@RapSheet) April 25, 2019

[Reply]
keg in kc 09:00 AM 04-25-2019
Originally Posted by carlos3652:
“Tyreek has maintained from the inception and throughout the investigation that he was innocent of any crime. Contrary to some media reports, Tyreek cooperated with law enforcement, waived his 5th Amend rights, and answered Qs from both police and DCF”

Based on Press Release from Reek.
I was wondering about the 5th amendment thing yesterday when I saw it mentioned seemingly out of the blue in Florio's (I think?) tweet. I don't remember hearing or reading that anywhere else.
[Reply]
O.city 09:00 AM 04-25-2019
Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19:
So now idiots like Florio can :-) about this 5th amendment bullshit.

We really have no clue what is going on here. We have ideas of what could be, but we nothing concrete. And I’m not sure we ever will.
That wasn't actually his statement. That was something made up.
[Reply]
keg in kc 09:01 AM 04-25-2019
Originally Posted by Dante84:
Where was mention of a belt? I didn't hear anything about that.

Genuinely curious.
Duncan posted some heresay earlier that it wasn't just a broken arm.
[Reply]
Marcellus 09:01 AM 04-25-2019
Originally Posted by O.city:
That wasn't actually his statement. That was something made up.
No that's directly from his statement.
[Reply]
stumppy 09:01 AM 04-25-2019
Originally Posted by In58men:
That’s what she gets for fucking up, not my problem.
Right! Leave your child with someone who abused them and use that information to not financially support your child.
[Reply]
carlos3652 09:02 AM 04-25-2019
Originally Posted by In58men:
Link?

Also in the Hill release:

“Tyreek has maintained from the inception and throughout the investigation that he was innocent of any crime. Contrary to some media reports, Tyreek cooperated with law enforcement, waived his 5th Amend rights, and answered Qs from both police and DCF” pic.twitter.com/j2giReGBWs

— Brooke Pryor (@bepryor) April 25, 2019


[Reply]
srvy 09:02 AM 04-25-2019
Originally Posted by In58men:
Link?
They showed on local news this morning that release from Tyreek most likely his lawyers.
[Reply]
O.city 09:03 AM 04-25-2019
Originally Posted by Marcellus:
No that's directly from his statement.
Ah shit, my bad. I didn't see that part.
[Reply]
srvy 09:05 AM 04-25-2019
Originally Posted by keg in kc:
Duncan posted some heresay earlier that it wasn't just a broken arm.
Whipped thats what Duncan reported. A whip would break flesh especially on a 3 yo child.
[Reply]
RunKC 09:05 AM 04-25-2019
Still think we should use one of those 2nd rd picks on a receiver. There’s just too many questions with this receiving core.

Can Sammy stay healthy?
Will Sammy even be here next year?
Do we want to extend Tyreek at this point?

Robinson is a FA after this season too.

Big need IMO
[Reply]
Eleazar 09:06 AM 04-25-2019
Originally Posted by keg in kc:
Duncan posted some heresay earlier that it wasn't just a broken arm.
It's heresay at this point, but from people who have good sources and the information completely fits the facts that are known, that the child sustained some severe injuries apart from the broken arm that could not be interpreted as any well-meaning attempt at discipline.
[Reply]
TwistedChief 09:07 AM 04-25-2019
Originally Posted by O.city:
Not just this situation, but in general, I think it's kind of fucked up that we hold the NFL to a higher standard than the legal system.

Maybe, moreso that the NFL gets into the disciplinary stuff above the law. It's such a slippery slope for them.

Like the Zeke thing.
I think you have this backward, buddy.

To take away someone's freedom should demand the highest standard of proof.

To take away someone's job should necessitate a somewhat lower burden.

It's why the burden of proof in a criminal case is much more severe than a civil one.
[Reply]
digger 09:08 AM 04-25-2019
Originally Posted by In58men:
Exactly, I would get a divorce and hold her history of abuse against her. She wouldn’t be able to file child support because I would have that little secret.

When shit hits the fan you come together to try to figure it out, that’s what happened here. They’re both covering for each other, I must be a piece of shit too because I couldn’t flat out call the cops on her over a broken arm.
They are not married.
[Reply]
TEX 09:08 AM 04-25-2019
Originally Posted by carlos3652:



Better delete this. It's not gonna sit well with the lynch mob crowd here. :-)
[Reply]
O.city 09:08 AM 04-25-2019
Originally Posted by TwistedChief:
I think you have this backward, buddy.

To take away someone's freedom should demand the highest standard of proof.

To take away someone's job should necessitate a somewhat lower burden.

It's why the burden of proof in a criminal case is much more severe than a civil one.
That's definitely true. I agree.

I guess I mean more that I don't know why the NFL wades into these waters the way they do.
[Reply]
Page 91 of 163
« First < 41818788899091 92939495101141 > Last »
Up