Originally Posted by htismaqe:
It wouldn't say anything about Hardman at all. This offense is designed to use as many weapons as possible.
You're looking at this wrong, man. Chiefs football has changed. They're not looking for war horses, they're looking for race horses.
Originally Posted by staylor26:
Exactly. It’s about making teams pay for the way they currently defend us and making it impossible to do successfully.
Who doesn’t want to see Pat absolutely loaded with weapons every single year?
They shoudl always be looking to keep weapons around him. That doesn't mean burning first rounders though.
Look at Andy's track record of drafting. He's always been great at developing WR's and such. In the end, it's about value. If the value is there for a WR, go for it.
The more I look around at the whole situation, it seems to be screaming trade back and amass some more picks when you see who will be around when we pick. [Reply]
Originally Posted by O.city:
They shoudl always be looking to keep weapons around him. That doesn't mean burning first rounders though.
Look at Andy's track record of drafting. He's always been great at developing WR's and such. In the end, it's about value. If the value is there for a WR, go for it.
The more I look around at the whole situation, it seems to be screaming trade back and amass some more picks when you see who will be around when we pick.
If a guy like Marshall or Toney is there, that's value. Marshall especially has a chance to be very good right away. He's NFL-ready and has tools. Look at what Jefferson did this year in Minnesota. Marshall is next in line. [Reply]
Originally Posted by htismaqe:
If a guy like Marshall or Toney is there, that's value. Marshall especially has a chance to be very good right away. He's NFL-ready and has tools. Look at what Jefferson did this year in Minnesota. Marshall is next in line.
I definitely like Toney alot. We'll see how it all shakes out.
Alot of the guys I like at 32 I think "he's a good pick there but I also like this guy who will be there in the mid 2nd etc". [Reply]
Originally Posted by htismaqe:
I don't know about that. He'd probably be available at 64.
I think so, but I keep seeing stuff about alot of these interior OL guys going around the mid late 30's.
If the Chiefs really like one of them, they could take one at 32 I suppose. I'd rather trade back a bit, grab maybe a 3rd rounder and then take him. [Reply]
Originally Posted by htismaqe:
If a guy like Marshall or Toney is there, that's value. Marshall especially has a chance to be very good right away. He's NFL-ready and has tools. Look at what Jefferson did this year in Minnesota. Marshall is next in line.
:whispers:
Marshall is a more explosive athlete than Jefferson
Originally Posted by htismaqe:
It would be a real shame to take an offensive lineman in the first if there's playmakers available.
You don't mess with success.
I'm good either way. Andy can develop dudes in later rounds if they have to. After taking a RB in the first round, they can't piss me off any more. [Reply]
I think you wait till round 2 and see who falls out of Dickerson, Humphrey, and Myers. I don’t think either of those guys go on the 1st, and I don’t se 3 centers going in round 2.
Then you possibly trade up round 3 for a WR or DE, depending on which of those 2 you get in the 1st.