Not surprised....but trust me everyone wants to win the big one (Super Bowl), don't kid yourself.

But if they don't fit in with the contenders, then yes most will go with "show me the money" mentality.

Luckily we have people who want to 3-peat....and be remembered beyond their careers....
[Reply]

So Derick Henry is going to be a Cowboy, right?
[Reply]

Or a Raven.
[Reply]

I would but pay him with what? He will want more than Hill and you threw away 1ST.
[Reply]

Hairhorn is on the decline.
[Reply]

So he can go to another team that flames out in the Playoff's?

And that would be both the Cowboys and the Ravens.
[Reply]

Veach gonna sign Saquon!
[Reply]

Yeah hope we are all freaking over Aaron Jones.
[Reply]

Aaron Jones kind of feels like Tranquil last year.... how is this guy a free agent again?

Wonder if his medicals are problematic.
[Reply]

No, not for a one year rental. It'd be amazing to watch Mahomes and Jefferson eviscerate defenses every week, but no. Give me a receiver with that first round pick that we can control for five years if we choose to.
[Reply]

Chiefs RB Room next year:

Pacheco
Barkley
Pollard
Swift

Brought to you by Magic Man Brat Vooch
[Reply]

Love Arron Jones. I would have also loved Jacobs.
[Reply]

Yeah, that makes sense too.

It just feels inevitable that the Cowboys will throw too much money at him. We'll see.
[Reply]

Now we getting erections.
[Reply]

Man, I'm just happy to be a Chiefs fan on days like this.

Jawaan Taylor got PAID last year, but man that deal, just like signing Thuney when we did, makes more and more sense by the day.

Same with Chris Jones, and its been only 2-3 days. I mean we keep the three time super bowl champion that plays big in big games, and his deal doesn't look bad after the first day of free agency. And apparently, the Raiders would have loved to sign Jones. Glad he's in KC.

Today also tells us that someone will pay Trey Smith a huge contract, it's not going to be the Chiefs. I'm fine with that. Wouldn't mind finding a guard in the draft because of it.
[Reply]