This is an interesting question as there appear to be several folks here whose next logical move if Hill is not cut, would be to disengage from the Chiefs entirely.
[Reply]

I didn't listen all the way to the end, but it sounded like the child has not been returned to them, but that they were not actually allowed to say this.
[Reply]

You may not want to hear but its true. If Hill abused his child like some are saying here then he needs to be jailed for life. I find it hard to believe it's as bad as some anonymous "friend with knowledge of the situation" says because the cops would have somebody in jail right now if it were. Even if it was just to apply pressure until someone fessed up. Our core judicial system was innocent until proven guilty.
[Reply]

“Well, bye!”
[Reply]

This is where I'm at - I totally trust Duncan too. I don't feel like this will end well.
[Reply]

Seems to me the DA was very unethical with his announcement. Our law states the presumption of innocence until proven guilty. His PC yesterday seemed to scream undertones of someone is guilty but we don't have the proof. That to me is not ethical from a person in his position.
[Reply]

Nobody on here has any proof of anything. A bunch of self righteous, opinionated, assholes is all I see!

You're convicting him without any evidence. The DA should be named Bob Mueller!
[Reply]

For life? Damn he didn’t die.

For all we know it could have been his wife and Hill isn’t about to snitch her out.

It would be hard for me to snitch on my wife, it’s gang gang fam.
[Reply]

I would never trust someone sharing confidential information. Sharing that information is probably against the law unless you are also in law enforcement or CPS? Is that the case?
[Reply]

You may have missed that this thread has gone off topic and most of this discussion in fact is not about a 3 year old being abused.
[Reply]

So, the DA says the parents abused the child and presents evidence that the child was abused. Do we know that it was the parents? Is the 3yr old talking? Who is going up on the stand to say that they did it?

One can deduce that when a kid is abused it's probably the parents, but is that going to hold up in a criminal court of law? This is why you'll invariably find that there are a lot more cases of children removed from abusive homes than parents formally charged with abuse.
[Reply]

I actually agree with this, if you aren't filing charges to basically stand in front of cameras and say the shit he did is at best covering your ass and at worst milking it cause you have political aspirations.
[Reply]

Seems to be a common approach by investigators these days doesn't it.
[Reply]

And for someone to come on a site as this and say "a friend of mine says..." …….is total bullshit and should be treated as such!
[Reply]

Pretty much...and His wife puppeteers his posts on the subject.
[Reply]