ChiefsPlanet Mobile
Page 84 of 105
« First < 34748081828384 8586878894 > Last »
Hall of Classics>101 random roasts by misc Roastmasters - Thread #2
Pasta Little Brioni 03:00 PM 05-20-2013
As a spinoff to the successful NFL Network's version of this and from the drama thread, it has come to fruition that this thread must be created.

Each day Hootie will reveal a member starting with 101 and working his way in order to number 1. I will update the OP as I see the names revealed.

*Warning this thread may cause a severe case of butthurt*

Let it begin!!

Hootie's List

Saul Good - A little about Roaster #2 (by frazod)
Spoiler!

85 BigRedChief
Spoiler!


84. StevieRay
Spoiler!


83. Rustshack
Spoiler!


82. KCnative
Spoiler!


81. Notorious
Spoiler!


80. Braincase
Spoiler!


79. big nasty kcnut
Spoiler!


78. crazycoffey
Spoiler!



77. Phobia

Spoiler!


76 Dave Lane

Spoiler!


75 KnowMo roasted by PGM
Spoiler!


74 Luv roasted by Mr. Flopnuts
Spoiler!


73. Mr Flopnuts
(by Iowanian)
Spoiler!


72. patteeu (by frazod)
Spoiler!


71. Bob Dole
Spoiler!

70. Sweet Daddy Hate/Raised On Riots/Darth CarlSatan (roasted by Clay)
Spoiler!

69.Setsuna (by rico)
Spoiler!

68. Burt (by J Diddy)
Spoiler!


67. petez28 (by PGM)
Spoiler!

[Reply]
Mr. Flopnuts 11:56 AM 07-02-2013
And honestly, this hasn't just happened in the last 30 minutes. I've had this argument time and time again with people, and it's just taken a lot of talking and perspectives to get me to this point.
[Reply]
Mr. Flopnuts 11:58 AM 07-02-2013
Originally Posted by Saul Good:
There are an incredible amount of historical inaccuracies within this post.

"White people" have most certainly not held most/all of the power since the country's inception. In fact, the very term "white people"as used today wouldn't have made sense centuries ago given the fact that we view whites in a much more homogenous manner today that in times past. Italians, Irish, etc. held virtually no power until relatively recently...that is to say nothing of the political makeup of the country prior to the 19th amendment giving women the right to vote.

As for the 2/5 part, I assume you're referring to the three fifths compromise. This compromise is completely misunderstood by most people...yourself included.

Treating slaves as only 3/5 of a person was the compromise. Slave owners wanted them treated as a full person. Abolitionists didn't want them counted at all.

Treating slaves as a full person wouldn't have given them new rights. It would have inflated the population of the south giving it more political representation in congress. The slave owners would, in essence, get an extra vote for every slave they owned. That's not really a plus for the slaves.

This doesn't really take away from your larger point, I guess. You should probably understand the history you're citing before basing your arguments on it, though.
Douche. I mean, touche!
[Reply]
BigCatDaddy 11:58 AM 07-02-2013
Originally Posted by loochy:
First of all, it doesn't bother us so much because we don't have a history of being kept down. Therefore, it's hard to find a superword to zing us. However, we don't appreciate double standards.

Second of all, Houstonwhodat kept saying "ninjas" and he got banned.

Ninjas doesn't apply to all black people.
I'm stunned.... I always thought you were a Mexican luchador.
[Reply]
rico 12:04 PM 07-02-2013
Originally Posted by Donger:
I kind of view redneck the same way as I do the "N" word. No, they don't apply to every person of the respective race, just the trashy kind. And, what Phobia said earlier certainly applies: context is key. If a Black person uses Cracker/Cracka in a derogatory way, that's inherently racist.
"Cracker" is the one "derogatory towards Caucasians" word that I have a problem with. And it all has to do with the origin of the word. To my knowledge, that word is derived from the "crack" of the whip on a slave's back. That is most definitely something I don't want to be associated with, let alone referred to as, for I have enough faith in my soul and my ability to be empathetic, that regardless of how I was raised, I wouldn't have been able to force myself to crack a whip on another human being's back.
[Reply]
Saul Good 12:05 PM 07-02-2013
Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts:
Ain't that the truth.



I grew up in Seattle, and hang out in casinos. So I know. Racism is racism is racism. I changed my mind. What's good for the goose is good for the gander. We should ban anyone talking that shit out of their assholes. Just forgive me if I don't get as worked up over the word redneck, as I do ****er, beaner, chink, gook, or whatnot. It's a work in progress I guess.
The simplest way I can explain why "reverse racism" slurs aren't as bad is that people who are in the majority don't wrap themselves in their majority trait.

Really tall people or really short people tend to be more conscious of their height than a guy who is 5'11.

A white person in the US doesn't really think about his own whiteness as much as he would if he moved to Asia.

A guy without a goatee might feel perfectly normal at a cocktail party in 2013, but that same guy might feel like an outsider at a Chiefs Planet get-together or if he went back in time to 1998.
[Reply]
Phobia 12:05 PM 07-02-2013
I don't care for the attitude that "we did something to them". "We" didn't include me. I deal with each person as an individual regardless of the color of their skin. Afford me the same courtesy. I love black people and I love black people who like jokes because I have jokes. I spend my saturdays playing ball where I'm a minority and it's some of the most fun I have all week. Good folks come in all different colors.
[Reply]
loochy 12:06 PM 07-02-2013
Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts:
Dude, he was making it a racial slur, and errone knows it. That's fucking horseshit.
I know it, and that's the point. Just because "redneck" isn't a bad slur, it could be used and intended as one.
[Reply]
Raiderhater 12:06 PM 07-02-2013
Originally Posted by Saul Good:
There are an incredible amount of historical inaccuracies within this post.

"White people" have most certainly not held most/all of the power since the country's inception. In fact, the very term "white people"as used today wouldn't have made sense centuries ago given the fact that we view whites in a much more homogenous manner today that in times past. Italians, Irish, etc. held virtually no power until relatively recently...that is to say nothing of the political makeup of the country prior to the 19th amendment giving women the right to vote.

As for the 2/5 part, I assume you're referring to the three fifths compromise. This compromise is completely misunderstood by most people...yourself included.

Treating slaves as only 3/5 of a person was the compromise. Slave owners wanted them treated as a full person. Abolitionists didn't want them counted at all.

Treating slaves as a full person wouldn't have given them new rights. It would have inflated the population of the south giving it more political representation in congress. The slave owners would, in essence, get an extra vote for every slave they owned. That's not really a plus for the slaves.

This doesn't really take away from your larger point, I guess. You should probably understand the history you're citing before basing your arguments on it, though.

Something else to add, in terms of the slavery aspect: blacks were rounded up and sold as slaves by fellow blacks. Blacks are as guilty of the slave trade as anyone. But it is only whitey that takes the blame.
[Reply]
Saul Good 12:09 PM 07-02-2013
Originally Posted by Raiderhader:
Something else to add, in terms of the slavery aspect: blacks were rounded up and sold as slaves by fellow blacks. Blacks are as guilty of the slave trade as anyone. But it is only whitey that takes the blame.
There are more slaves in the world today than at any time in human history.
[Reply]
loochy 12:09 PM 07-02-2013
Originally Posted by Raiderhader:
Something else to add, in terms of the slavery aspect: blacks were rounded up and sold as slaves by fellow blacks. Blacks are as guilty of the slave trade as anyone. But it is only whitey that takes the blame.
It's like the guy that buys a stolen car and doesn't want to give it back.
[Reply]
loochy 12:10 PM 07-02-2013
Originally Posted by Saul Good:
There are more slaves in the world today than at any time in human history.
We're all slaves to the man.
[Reply]
BigCatDaddy 12:13 PM 07-02-2013
Originally Posted by loochy:
We're all slaves to the man.
Fucking Donger.
[Reply]
Donger 12:17 PM 07-02-2013
Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy:
****ing Donger.
That's right. Just make your mark.
[Reply]
Marcellus 12:19 PM 07-02-2013
Originally Posted by rico:
Haha.

But dude, the shit was crazy.

Then when I got inside, I googled some shit about snapping turtles biting people and read this story about this dude in Australia who got his penis bit by one. The snapping turtle didn't end up biting this guy's penis off (props to this guy's penis, I guess), but it did end up clamping and locking it's jaws and wouldn't release itself from the shaft of this Australian man's penis. They ended up having to pry the snapper's jaws off this guy's penis with a crow-bar. I can't imagine ANYTHING that would be more horrifying than that. I've been scared shitless of snapping turtles ever since.
You may only have 3150 posts but if there was a "words posted counter" I imagine you would be second behind Claynus.
[Reply]
rico 12:22 PM 07-02-2013
Originally Posted by Marcellus:
You may only have 3150 posts but if there was a "words posted counter" I imagine you would be second behind Claynus.
oic
[Reply]
Page 84 of 105
« First < 34748081828384 8586878894 > Last »
Up