Originally Posted by Chiefs Pantalones:
I love Terez, but he’s never broken anything. He always has the “so and so had it first” tweet after it has been reported. He’s not at La Canfora’s level (who has broken a lot of news, including the trading of Marcus Peters a week before it went down) yet.
He was the first person to break the Alex Smith trade [Reply]
Basically means that KC is open to trading for him but will NOT extend. They probably want to flip him next offseason like we’ve been talking about. [Reply]
Originally Posted by RunKC:
Try and call about Patrick Peterson in a month and if not, make due with what you have and attack it this offseason.
Aqib Talib
Chris Harris Jr
Ronald Darby
Jimmy Smith
Logan Ryan
Brandon Carr
The FA corner class is as strong next year as I can remember it being. See if you can get one of those guys to want to come in and play with Pat. Then use your 1st on a corner.
This is the exact path we took last year.
And then promptly watched Tom Brady convert 3 straight 3rd downs on his way to the Super Bowl.
No thanks. I'm out on not attacking a glaring need when the solution is potentially right in front of your face.
This is a move Belichick makes. And it's why they win. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Amnorix:
Clearly, the Chiefs could use more talent on D to help them win. If the cost for Ramsey is 2 1sts and his agent is saying he wants the most money, and most guaranteed money, for a CB ever after his contract is up next year, I'd think long and hard about whether 2 1sts is worth what may be a two year rental for a player who will bring back a 3rd -- MAYBE -- as a comp pick.
My gut says no he ain’t worth the price. Unless, he helps the Chiefs win the Superbowl but thats no guarantee. [Reply]
Originally Posted by MAHOMO 4 LIFE!:
Guys can we all just come together. I know everyone wants a answer on Ramsey but it may take a little bit till we find out. Till then let’s just remain calm and be friends :-)
Can you get us some random tweets that either give us hope or crush it? [Reply]
Originally Posted by -King-:
The Patriots are just a bit better than the Raiders.
This.. we didn’t touch Brady and he had his way with us cause we were a hot mess in the secondary... maybe if we can cover a little better.... who knows [Reply]
Originally Posted by Strongside:
This is the exact path we took last year.
And then promptly watched Tom Brady convert 3 straight 3rd downs on his way to the Super Bowl.
No thanks. I'm out on not attacking a glaring need when the solution is potentially right in front of your face.
This is a move Belichick makes. And it's why they win.
1000% this.
At this juncture, fuck patience. I get wanting to play the long game, but we need a god damn championship. And Ramsey brings us closer to that goal, and will bring us closer than any other available player. [Reply]
Someone explain to me why we can’t trade for him as a rental, use him to win a ring, and then after the Super Bowl, flip him to another team for their first rounder that would be a higher pick than our original first round pick was? [Reply]
Originally Posted by Amnorix:
Clearly, the Chiefs could use more talent on D to help them win. If the cost for Ramsey is 2 1sts and his agent is saying he wants the most money, and most guaranteed money, for a CB ever after his contract is up next year, I'd think long and hard about whether 2 1sts is worth what may be a two year rental for a player who will bring back a 3rd -- MAYBE -- as a comp pick.
Everyone knows you will be totally flipping this position if the Pats trade for him. :-) [Reply]
Originally Posted by comochiefsfan:
Someone explain to me why we can’t trade for him as a rental, use him to win a ring, and then after the Super Bowl, flip him to another team for another team’s first rounder that would be a higher pick than our original first round pick was?
