Moving up to 15-20 would require them to be 100 percent sure it was a can’t miss player who makes them dominant somewhere. I don’t think we’ll see it. But if we did it would say a lot about their evaluation of said player.
Moving up in the second? That I COULD see if Bienemy gets the Texans job. That pick plus a 5th next year is about right to move up to the middle of the second round. [Reply]
What happened to the logic of drafting BPA in the 1st? The Chiefs are already set at the superstar positions that guarantee 10-12 wins per season minimum. No need to fixate on a specific position at 32- just select the best player with some small consideration given to position (no K, nor P). [Reply]
Originally Posted by el borracho:
What happened to the logic of drafting BPA in the 1st? The Chiefs are already set at the superstar positions that guarantee 10-12 wins per season minimum. No need to fixate on a specific position at 32- just select the best player with some small consideration given to position (no K, nor P).
BPA has to take into account value.
Drafting a guard or LB at 32 when there's an equivalent DE or WR available is just throwing away draft capital.
The NFL is all about matchups. Playmakers create favorable matchups.
Priority should always be on playmakers first. [Reply]
Originally Posted by htismaqe:
BPA has to take into account value.
Drafting a guard or LB at 32 when there's an equivalent DE or WR available is just throwing away draft capital.
The NFL is all about matchups. Playmakers create favorable matchups.
Priority should always be on playmakers first.
The two mocks I've seen (one was by Kiper, i think) show KC taking either a WR or a DE at 32. I would actually be kind of interested to see what Kohlmann thinks. [Reply]
