What adjustments do we make to stop Henry? Even with a healthy Chris jones, we would want a heavier dose of Saunders, Pennel, and suggs anyway, right? Probably see Ragland in on a lot more snaps? [Reply]
Tannehill has 160 yds passing and 3 TDs in 2 playoff games. That is so incredibly bad and if he has a game like those 1st two games against the Chiefs, then we are going to win by atleast 21 points. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Megatron96:
No, we really don't. We can't let him run for a big play. But we don't necessarily have ot stop Henry to win. The Pats allowed him to run for 182 yards and a TD, and if not for a bad INT, the Patsies could've won that game.
Let me repeat that:
Derrick Henry ran for 182 yards on the Patriots and the TEN offense only produced 2 TDs for the whole game.
We have to stop Tannehill. If we can keep him from producing a score, it doesn't really matter if Henry runs for 180 yards and a TD or two.
And in spite of the Titans toadies on here, Tannehill is not a great QB. He's right about average. He's not going to put the Titans on his shoulders and manufacture two scoring drives at the end of the game. That's simply not who he is.
You notice the repeating string of text you (and others) keep using there? "If not for... the Titans would have lost." My rebuttal is that this is bullshit. That's how they play the game. They keep it close, they grind on you, and then they beat your ass at the end. In my opinion, stopping Henry is the most important thing in the game. [Reply]