We don't really have one of these yet, so figured we could use this as a place to discuss potential free agent acquisitions and what we would like to look for them to bring in.
If any of you guys are interested, heres a good place to do some research.
Originally Posted by suzzer99:
Am I the only one who isn't excited about a 1st for Clark? We're gonna have to pay him and he's got a history, we don't need any more of that.
95% of CP agrees with you. You’re not on an island. [Reply]
Originally Posted by staylor26:
We’re not going to trade for and pay a guy with a history of domestic violence after what’s happened with Hunt and Hill. Zero chance.
Originally Posted by Chris Meck:
the next 12-13 years is a great opportunity for us. We need to act like it.
We've been burned on woman beaters already; we just jettisoned the huge contracts. We don't need to shell out for another one.
Nope. The Packers are proof of this. QB’s making elite cap hits seriously hinders your ability to build the team, as well as picking in the back end of the first rd all the time.
It will be significantly harder when Pat is making $35-40 million cap hits. [Reply]
Originally Posted by RunKC:
Nope. The Packers are proof of this. QB’s making elite cap hits seriously hinders your ability to build the team, as well as picking in the back end of the first rd all the time.
It will be significantly harder when Pat is making $35-40 million cap hits.
If it weren’t for a terrible HC, terrible drafts, and Rodgers injuries, they could’ve easily won a couple more.
When it comes to reasons why they didn’t win, the salary cap is way down the list. [Reply]
At this point if we get 2 more great seasons out of Hill - then let him go when he might be losing a step anyway - I'm ok with it. Giving him a big contract just seems like a bad idea.
Unless it comes out that he definitively had nothing to do with the issues with the kid. [Reply]