Chiefs 2019 Free agency Thread - Page 766

Originally Posted by suzzer99:
Am I the only one who isn't excited about a 1st for Clark? We're gonna have to pay him and he's got a history, we don't need any more of that.

95% of CP agrees with you. You’re not on an island.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by staylor26:
I’m still not buying it AT ALL.

It’s not going to happen.

I can see Veach’s philosophy here. You have a few more years until Pat makes insane cap hits and this is an all in season.

Ferrell, Bradbury and Murphy will be long gone along with the other blue chippers.

If you can trade 29 for a player as good as Frank Clark has been, why not? This is it man. The next 2-3 years is a great opportunity for us.

Gotta draft well and find decent cheap players like Wylie, Reiter, Ward though. Should be interesting.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by RunKC:
I can see Veach’s philosophy here. You have a few more years until Pat makes insane cap hits and this is an all in season.

Ferrell, Bradbury and Murphy will be long gone along with the other blue chippers.

If you can trade 29 for a player as good as Frank Clark has been, why not? This is it man. The next 2-3 years is a great opportunity for us.

Gotta draft well and find decent cheap players like Wylie, Reiter, Ward though. Should be interesting.

Murphy should still be there
[Reply]

Originally Posted by MAHOMO 4 LIFE!:
Murphy should still be there

Lol no
[Reply]

Originally Posted by RunKC:
I can see Veach’s philosophy here. You have a few more years until Pat makes insane cap hits and this is an all in season.

Ferrell, Bradbury and Murphy will be long gone along with the other blue chippers.

If you can trade 29 for a player as good as Frank Clark has been, why not? This is it man. The next 2-3 years is a great opportunity for us.

Gotta draft well and find decent cheap players like Wylie, Reiter, Ward though. Should be interesting.

the next 12-13 years is a great opportunity for us. We need to act like it.

We've been burned on woman beaters already; we just jettisoned the huge contracts. We don't need to shell out for another one.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by staylor26:
I’m still not buying it AT ALL.

It’s not going to happen.

I doubt Veach wants to part ways with his 1st overall. He'll try to pry Clark away with some 2nds.
[Reply]

Are the Chiefs just going to ignore Hill and Jones...and pay high priced FAs Mathieu and Clark first? Jones has to be thinking WTF....
[Reply]

Originally Posted by RunKC:
I can see Veach’s philosophy here. You have a few more years until Pat makes insane cap hits and this is an all in season.

Ferrell, Bradbury and Murphy will be long gone along with the other blue chippers.

If you can trade 29 for a player as good as Frank Clark has been, why not? This is it man. The next 2-3 years is a great opportunity for us.

Gotta draft well and find decent cheap players like Wylie, Reiter, Ward though. Should be interesting.

We’re not going to trade for and pay a guy with a history of domestic violence after what’s happened with Hunt and Hill. Zero chance.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by staylor26:
We’re not going to trade for and pay a guy with a history of domestic violence after what’s happened with Hunt and Hill. Zero chance.

Don’t hold your breath.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Chief Northman:
Don’t hold your breath.

Unless they know Hill is innocent
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Chris Meck:
the next 12-13 years is a great opportunity for us. We need to act like it.

We've been burned on woman beaters already; we just jettisoned the huge contracts. We don't need to shell out for another one.

Nope. The Packers are proof of this. QB’s making elite cap hits seriously hinders your ability to build the team, as well as picking in the back end of the first rd all the time.

It will be significantly harder when Pat is making $35-40 million cap hits.
[Reply]

Why does Seattle want to move him? That should be a legitimate question in this whole equation.

Young, productive...home grown. You normally retain those players...
[Reply]

Originally Posted by RunKC:
Nope. The Packers are proof of this. QB’s making elite cap hits seriously hinders your ability to build the team, as well as picking in the back end of the first rd all the time.

It will be significantly harder when Pat is making $35-40 million cap hits.

If it weren’t for a terrible HC, terrible drafts, and Rodgers injuries, they could’ve easily won a couple more.

When it comes to reasons why they didn’t win, the salary cap is way down the list.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by staylor26:
Lol no

He also thinks Sweat is dropping out of the first round. Ignore.
[Reply]

At this point if we get 2 more great seasons out of Hill - then let him go when he might be losing a step anyway - I'm ok with it. Giving him a big contract just seems like a bad idea.

Unless it comes out that he definitively had nothing to do with the issues with the kid.
[Reply]