Originally Posted by htismaqe:
Pointing out that Veach didn't have any first round picks while Dorsey had TWO isn't a "defense", it's a statement of fact.
Veach's issue has nothing to do with not having a 1, it's that he used high picks to draft guys that at best would see marginal playing time while having a dumpster fire of a secondary..
He also saw fit to pay Anthony Hitchens like a all pro. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Mecca:
Veach's issue has nothing to do with not having a 1, it's that he used high picks to draft guys that at best would see marginal playing time while having a dumpster fire of a secondary..
He also saw fit to pay Anthony Hitchens like a all pro.
It's also that he didn't really use a high pick because he didn't have one. [Reply]
Originally Posted by O.city:
After 1 year, I don't really know if you can defend or judge either way yet.
1.5 years and yea you can. You dont pay an injured player like Watkins that kind of money and hes found literally 0 talent in the secondary. How many years is it supposed to take a "stud" GM to find talent? [Reply]
Originally Posted by Titty Meat:
1.5 years and yea you can. You dont pay an injured player like Watkins that kind of money and hes found literally 0 talent in the secondary. How many years is it supposed to take a "stud" GM to find talent?
Originally Posted by Titty Meat:
1.5 years and yea you can. You dont pay an injured player like Watkins that kind of money and hes found literally 0 talent in the secondary. How many years is it supposed to take a "stud" GM to find talent?
If Dorsey was or is as good as you contend, why did Veach need to find all this talent in the secondary? shouldn't it already be here? [Reply]
Originally Posted by O.city:
If Dorsey was or is as good as you contend, why did Veach need to find all this talent in the secondary? shouldn't it already be here?
Because Berry is aging and they traded away their best corner. [Reply]