Our Wr's wont scare anybody this week, if we have to trot out Pringle, Hardman, and Robinson! If one of them goes down, who is left, DAT? were in trouble if we go down that far,,,,:-( [Reply]
Originally Posted by farmerchief:
Our Wr's wont scare anybody this week, if we have to trot out Pringle, Hardman, and Robinson! If one of them goes down, who is left, DAT? were in trouble if we go down that far,,,,:-(
No, we're in trouble if we have to trot out Matt Moore. If the OL can give Pat some time to throw, we'll be fine. [Reply]
Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19:
This is the take. Only problem is, can we give him time?
For his sake I hope...
That is the question, for sure. My guess (read: hope) is that they are putting together a gp that includes the Cheetah, and getting the ball out of Pat's hands quickly on short routes. I have no idea if he's going to be able to physically do what he does best - effectively roll out the pocket and throw.
That all leads me to my next point. We don't have to run the ball 30+ times on Sunday, but we better find a way to be more productive when we do. IMO, that means more Shady and less Dam. W. I know Shady put the ball on the ground after that big reception, but he had 0 carries Sunday night. That just can't happen moving forward. He's been our most productive RB carrying the ball (5.4 ypc). I think he needs at least 8-12 rushing attempts against the Titans. [Reply]
Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19:
This is the take. Only problem is, can we give him time?
For his sake I hope...
That is the question, for sure. My guess (read: hope) is that they are putting together a gp that includes the Cheetah, and getting the ball out of Pat's hands quickly on short routes. I have no idea if he's going to be able to physically do what he does best - effectively roll out the pocket and throw.
That all leads me to my next point. We don't have to run the ball 30+ times on Sunday, but we better find a way to be more productive when we do. IMO, that means more Shady and less Dam. W. I know Shady put the ball on the ground after that big reception, but he had 0 carries Sunday night. That just can't happen moving forward. He's been our most productive RB carrying the ball (5.4 ypc). I think he needs at least 8-12 rushing attempts against the Titans. [Reply]
I think more likely that not we will be without both Tyreek and Sammy.
Hopefully we play angry/aggressive after the loss and come out focused and prepared for a 12 round fight because the Texans are not going to get blown out without us having our weapons. No chance.
This is a game where we really need the defense to give us at least a little bit of confidence going forward. [Reply]