We don't really have one of these yet, so figured we could use this as a place to discuss potential free agent acquisitions and what we would like to look for them to bring in.
If any of you guys are interested, heres a good place to do some research.
There is a special meeting today at 4:15 PT to discuss the coaches views on replay & rules changes. Sounds like the owners are really listening to their concerns. Yesterday, Bill Belichick & Andy Reid stood up and asked everyone to stay & figure it out. That led to 2 more hours.
There is a special meeting today at 4:15 PT to discuss the coaches views on replay & rules changes. Sounds like the owners are really listening to their concerns. Yesterday, Bill Belichick & Andy Reid stood up and asked everyone to stay & figure it out. That led to 2 more hours.
Just FYI so that people don't get the wrong idea from Schefter's tweet - this was posted yesterday on SBNation (great little tidbit in there about Andy's Hawaiian shirts too, good for a giggle).
Originally Posted by : Kansas City wants guaranteed possessions in overtime
A motion from the Chiefs aims to change overtime rules to ensure both teams possess the ball at least once in the extra period — a proposal that comes months after Kansas City didn’t get a chance to field its offense as the Patriots ran away with a 37-31 overtime win in the AFC title game.
Their rule would also eliminate overtime in the preseason and eliminate the overtime coin toss, instead allowing the team who won the game-opening toss to choose whether to receive the ball or defer.
This proposal didn’t make it out of the committee in Arizona, but it will be discussed when the league holds its annual Spring Meeting this May — so it’s not completely licked yet.
The Chiefs' proposal of OT was tabled, it won't be discussed again until May. Devner's onside kick proposal was rejected. It's over.
My guess is Reid and BB asked them to stay to continue discussion expanded replay. They're trying to make defensive PI and certain other penalties reviewable.
So far, the only staunch opposition seems to be coming from Mike Tomlin, which is apt since he's a punk and coaches cheap shots. [Reply]
Originally Posted by MAHOMO 4 LIFE!:
Probably a 1 and a 3
Cards might want a 1st round pick but no team would give them that much IMO.
The guy wil be 29 years old soon and we all know CBs can fall off a cliff once they get past 30. What age what Revis when he declined substantially again?
I'd be willing to give them a 2nd this year and 2nd next year at the very maximum. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Buckweath:
Cards might want a 1st round pick but no team would give them that much IMO.
The guy wil be 29 years old soon and we all know CBs can fall off a cliff once they get past 30. What age what Revis when he declined substantially again?
I'd be willing to give them a 2nd this year and 2nd next year at the very maximum.
And they'll respond by telling you good luck with Breeland covering Antonio Brown. [Reply]
Originally Posted by htismaqe:
The Chiefs' proposal of OT was tabled, it won't be discussed again until May. Devner's onside kick proposal was rejected. It's over.
My guess is Reid and BB asked them to stay to continue discussion expanded replay. They're trying to make defensive PI and certain other penalties reviewable.
So far, the only staunch opposition seems to be coming from Mike Tomlin, which is apt since he's a punk and coaches cheap shots.
That’s too bad. The Denver onside kick proposal would have given us a massive advantage.
Would have been nice to have our rival throw us a bone. [Reply]
