True but for whatever reason, AR seems love JAG's like him and Wilson.
It's pretty crazy to see a veteran NFL coach play favorites.
Wilson and Reid are not in the same stratosphere. Wilson is relatively cheap and is productive when called upon. He's a JAG, yes.
Jah Reid is not a JAG. He's a complete piece of shit.
I'll take JAG for my swing tackle but Reid can't clear that bar. Hell, Reid can't even make it to that bar. He sees the JAG bar and limbos under the damn thing. He's trash. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Pestilence:
That worthless fuck has the 12th highest cap hit on this team. Let that sink in.
Fortunately he's going to get cut and that cap number will come off the books and roll over for us next season when we can put it to good use.
Because again, Pest - I absolutely refuse to consider the possibility that he makes this team. It's not a thought worth having. I'm convinced there are people in the stands every Sunday that wouldn't be actively worse than Jah Reid. Some of them are women. [Reply]
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud:
$8 million is his cap number but I'd imagine Buffalo would eat his Dead Cap, so the Chiefs would only be responsible for $6 million.
That said, I highly doubt they're going to trade him on the cheap and he IS 29 years old, so the wheels could fall of at any time.
Originally Posted by Pestilence:
6 of those TDs came in the first 8 weeks of the year. 3 in one game. He's a 31 year old RB that has been used a ton. No thanks.
Yeah, I'd still rather see Ryan Mathews than pretty much anyone other than Matt Jones. [Reply]
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud:
I guess I wasn't paying attention and need to go back and re-watch.
But he only spent one day at CB and while the Chiefs initially suggested that's where they'd play him, I can't see them keeping him at a CB at this point.
I think he clears waivers. Keep in mind, some team would need to cut one of their safeties in order to claim him.
Just read that McQuay only played ST's in Seattle. That's a bit odd. I wonder if we are trying to hide him? [Reply]