gonna have to put together audio of golic and pryor going off on hill in their disgusting ways...the "something seemed off about him" is easily rippable [Reply]
I came across the husband’s profile yesterday actually, and he’s constantly ‘liking’ shit that slanders Hill. You can put two and two together and see that Brooke feels she’s done absolutely nothing wrong.
She just needs to find a new job. For the best of everyone. She will never be able to have credibility here again. [Reply]
Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19:
I came across the husband’s profile yesterday actually, and he’s constantly ‘liking’ shit that slanders Hill. You can put two and two together and see that Brooke feels she’s done absolutely nothing wrong.
She just needs to find a new job. For the best of everyone. She will never be able to have credibility here again.
2) No, no, no, no. What we want, is for her to remain employed here for a decade. A decade of absolute suffering. What has she done to earn the opportunity to go work for some high-profile liberal rag in a larger City? Absolutely nothing.
so she and her fat husband, can stay right here in good old hayseed country, where they will both learn firsthand and on a daily basis let the citizens of this part of the world do not take kindly to her media activism as opposed to being a legitimate journalist.
Let this bitch eat cake. And God knows you won't have to ask her twice to do so. [Reply]
Aha, I think in that last interview she did on Golics show it speaks to what the Star is doing...
They asked her how the feeling is in Kansas City to which she responded "While I think there is shock and outrage nationally in Kansas City everyone is happy and feels vindicated he's not suspended. They think that the road to the superbowl is more clear and I'm sure he will get Tyreek chants at the home opener"
I think that they really think Chiefs fans are bad people, she made sure to make sure to say her twitter is full of people who are happy he's back. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Willie Lanier:
Please point out where I attacked her based on appearance...
I was simply pointing out that the basis of your argument sounds like a guy who can't get laid and spits out feminist idioms in a laughable attempt to sound "woke" enough to get girls..
But hey, you do you bud, whatever works for you
I didn't say you attacked her appearance. But there are a ton of posts in this thread that use her weight, he ugly face, and her ugly body as reasons why she sucks, instead of just using her lack of journalistic integrity, her apparent racism, and her hack-level writing as the reasons why they hate her.
I DGAF if people think that my views on how women should be treated makes me a pussy or SJW, etc. It is sad that grown men on here think that insulting women based on their physical appearance is okay. Those men are acting like incels and seem to be proud of it.
Originally Posted by Mecca:
Being completely honest about this, she looks like someone that thought this Hill story was going to get her out of this market and now she is super pissed that not only is she still here but she's catching shit for it.
Brooke Pryor is not going to be liked in *any* market as an NFL team's beat reporter. She probably felt that this Hill thing, and the ensuing articles she could write throwing Hunt under the bus for creating an atmosphere where domestic abuse is tolerated would allow her to be a sports social commentator some place, which is what she wants. Like most "journalists", she has no desire to be a reporter, she wants to be a commentator. [Reply]
It is absolutely, 100% okay for a man to insult a woman based upon her looks. The current culture of idiocy is not going to dictate to any of us how we are going to act or interact with people.
And I'll go so far as to say that I don't give a damn if they pass criminal laws attached to such idiocy, we will never obey.
This is OUR country, and we do not bow to the will of would be social engineers and dictators. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Hate:
It is absolutely, 100% okay for a man to insult a woman based upon her looks. The current culture of idiocy is not going to dictate to any of us how we are going to act or interact with people. My
and I'll go so far as to say that I don't give a damn if they pass criminal laws attached to such idiocy, we will never obey.
0
This is OUR country, and we do not bow to the will of would be social engineers and dictators.
The reason that insults coming from men aimed at women often involve denigrating a woman's looks is *not* sexism. Yes, it's very personal, and not nice, but it cuts a woman harder than it cuts a man because much more of a woman's sexual market value is determined by looks compared to a man. It's a way to inflict pain on women. [Reply]
Originally Posted by ChiefsFanatic:
I didn't say you attacked her appearance. But there are a ton of posts in this thread that use her weight, he ugly face, and her ugly body as reasons why she sucks, instead of just using her lack of journalistic integrity, her apparent racism, and her hack-level writing as the reasons why they hate her.
I DGAF if people think that my views on how women should be treated makes me a pussy or SJW, etc. It is sad that grown men on here think that insulting women based on their physical appearance is okay. Those men are acting like incels and seem to be proud of it.
Sent from my GM1915 using Tapatalk
People getting distracted by things other than her being horrible at her job will accomplish getting her out of KC and right into a bigger and better paying job for her sjw ways. If that’s the goal then it will likely be accomplished....... [Reply]
Originally Posted by Mecca:
Being completely honest about this, she looks like someone that thought this Hill story was going to get her out of this market and now she is super pissed that not only is she still here but she's catching shit for it.
I think you are right. She is a journalistic hack with no writing, or reporting skills, and she thought that breaking this story would help her move up to the big leagues. Whitlock, Nick Wright, Terez Paylor, etc. used the KC Star, and Kansas City sports talk radio, as springboards on their way to ESPN and Yahoo Sports jobs, where they have a national audience.
What pisses me off the most is that the national media seems to be doing exactly what she did in ignoring evidence that doesn't support their views of Hill as a violent abuser. The national media is just too lazy to do any actual reporting, choosing to report her headlines as if they were the facts of the case.
Which is why we are going to do our very very best to keep her employed here. We want her here because she hates being here. It is the absolute best punishment for her. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Hate:
Which is why we are going to do our very very best to keep her employed here. We want her here because she hates being here. It is the absolute best punishment for her.
Originally Posted by ChiefsFanatic:
I didn't say you attacked her appearance. But there are a ton of posts in this thread that use her weight, he ugly face, and her ugly body as reasons why she sucks, instead of just using her lack of journalistic integrity, her apparent racism, and her hack-level writing as the reasons why they hate her.
I DGAF if people think that my views on how women should be treated makes me a pussy or SJW, etc. It is sad that grown men on here think that insulting women based on their physical appearance is okay. Those men are acting like incels and seem to be proud of it.
Sent from my GM1915 using Tapatalk
It's a lot like the Anthem protest, from the outside looking in nobody is focusing on the "cause" they are focusing on the action.
Making fun of her looks and weight only makes her look like a victim and distracts from how shitty she is at her job. [Reply]