We don't really have one of these yet, so figured we could use this as a place to discuss potential free agent acquisitions and what we would like to look for them to bring in.
If any of you guys are interested, heres a good place to do some research.
Originally Posted by Iconic:
You guys will be fine, relax. Even if Hill gets busted who gives a ****? Sure it'll sting but our QB has the potential to be the greatest of all time - even better than Tom ****ing Brady. We've got a nice bit of cap space, a HOF worthy HC, and a GM that attacks like a Boeing B-52. I think we are in good hands.
Yep. If he gets cut, well, that just helps our future cap situation and lets Veach go wild in the trade market. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Iconic:
You guys will be fine, relax. Even if Hill gets busted who gives a ****? Sure it'll sting but our QB has the potential to be the greatest of all time - even better than Tom ****ing Brady. We've got a nice bit of cap space, a HOF worthy HC, and a GM that attacks like a Boeing B-52. I think we are in good hands.
I know what you’re saying but Ty is like nothing we’ve ever seen on the field. He cannot he replaced.
Will they still be good? Sure but he’s their 2nd best player IMO [Reply]
Originally Posted by Iconic:
You guys will be fine, relax. Even if Hill gets busted who gives a ****? Sure it'll sting but our QB has the potential to be the greatest of all time - even better than Tom ****ing Brady. We've got a nice bit of cap space, a HOF worthy HC, and a GM that attacks like a Boeing B-52. I think we are in good hands.
I know what you’re saying but Ty is like nothing we’ve ever seen on the field. He cannot he replaced.
Will they still be good? Sure but he’s their 2nd best player IMO [Reply]
I'm just glad it's not Mahomes under questioning.
Tom Brady has won 6 Super Bowls with different receivers.
One year he won the SB with a rag tag bunch that no one gave a chance.
We'll be fine.... [Reply]
Originally Posted by MatriculatingHank:
I'm just glad it's not Mahomes under questioning.
Tom Brady has won 6 Super Bowls with different receivers.
One year he won the SB with a rag tag bunch that no one gave a chance.
We'll be fine....
Originally Posted by MotherfuckerJones: Suddenly, WR is need even more so now. I’ve been hoping to keep both 2s so we could get a Riley Ridley or something in round 2.
Originally Posted by MotherfuckerJones:
Suddenly, WR is need even more so now. I’ve been hoping to keep both 2s so we could get a Riley Ridley or something in round 2.
We need to wait for more information on the Hill situation.
Regardless of that outcome we need to stay focused on the D with our first few picks, unless an absolute stud at TE or WR falls to us. Great QBs, which Pat certainly looks the part of, elevate the receiving core around them. Losing Hill would be a huge blow, yes, but it's not insurmountable. [Reply]
Originally Posted by duncan_idaho:
So ... are there any deep threat WR types worth spending some $$$ on? Haven’t been much attention to that but seems like a good idea to have a third option, in case of the first two deep threat WRs is not available...
Deebo Samuel but we'll need to focus on RB too - Justice Hill - hire D w/ trades and half the draft -- D and O [Reply]
Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19:
I know what you’re saying but Ty is like nothing we’ve ever seen on the field. He cannot he replaced.
Will they still be good? Sure but he’s their 2nd best player IMO
I want Hill here and I think he will be but he's a WR. If he's so super human then how did Bill take him away? Mahomes doesn't need Hill to move the chains. He's a weapon not everything. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Red Dawg:
I want Hill here and I think he will be but he's a WR. If he's so super human then how did Bill take him away? Mahomes doesn't need Hill to move the chains. He's a weapon not everything.
He doesn't need Hill but he needs something a heck of a lot better than whatever the Chiefs have after Watkins and Kelce. [Reply]