A big issue however is the large amount of needs with the defense. The CB position does need upgraded, but we also need a NT, a WILB, depth or upgrade at ROLB, safety depth or upgrade at S.
Veach is going to have a major challenge filling all of these needs in logical succession. [Reply]
Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19:
A big issue however is the large amount of needs with the defense. The CB position does need upgraded, but we also need a NT, a WILB, depth or upgrade at ROLB, safety depth or upgrade at S.
Veach is going to have a major challenge filling all of these needs in logical succession.
It would be so key to get the first this year. That’d allow KC to get two very impactful players on defense in the first 3 rounds.
Im dying for this trade compensation, so I can start thinking about even more prospects. KC will look vastly different on defense. I really want Tim Settle in round 2. A DL of say, Chris Jones, Tim Settle and Sheldon Richardson or Payne or Vea would be dynamic. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Mother****erJones:
It would be so key to get the first this year. That’d allow KC to get two very impactful players on defense in the first 3 rounds.
Im dying for this trade compensation, so I can start thinking about even more prospects. KC will look vastly different on defense. I really want Tim Settle in round 2. A DL of say, Chris Jones, Tim Settle and Sheldon Richardson or Payne or Vea would be dynamic.
I’m all for using the money to load up on the front 7 and draft Settle. Relieve some pressure for the secondary, get us in more 3rd-and-longs. [Reply]
Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19:
I’m all for using the money to load up on the front 7 and draft Settle. Relieve some pressure for the secondary, get us in more 3rd-and-longs.
I sure wouldn’t hate an all-Va Tech draft in rounds 1-2. (Trading up for Edmunds and taking Settle) [Reply]
Originally Posted by Mother****erJones:
I sure wouldn’t hate an all-Va Tech draft in rounds 1-2. (Trading up for Edmunds and taking Settle)
I’m not sure if trading up will be viable or not. We really need to know the Peters trade return. If Veach can trade up into R1 and wants to for a particular player, I hope that he does. But at this juncture I don’t think we have the assets to do so without ruining the rest of the draft. [Reply]
Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19:
I’m not sure if trading up will be viable or not. We really need to know the Peters trade return. If Veach can trade up into R1 and wants to for a particular player, I hope that he does. But at this juncture I don’t think we have the assets to do so without ruining the rest of the draft.
It’s dependent on the first from the Rams obviously. [Reply]
Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19:
A big issue however is the large amount of needs with the defense. The CB position does need upgraded, but we also need a NT, a WILB, depth or upgrade at ROLB, safety depth or upgrade at S.
Veach is going to have a major challenge filling all of these needs in logical succession.
I think it is a 2 year fix. If we don't get all of the parts filled this season, so be it. Have the championship defense in place in year two of Mahomes's at the helm! [Reply]
I’m starting to warm up to the idea of signing Trumaine Johnson. All depends on the price obviously. I think he’d solidify our CB as one of the better units in the league again. [Reply]
Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19:
I’m starting to warm up to the idea of signing Trumaine Johnson. All depends on the price obviously. I think he’d solidify our CB as one of the better units in the league again.
Problem is you have to pay Fuller, Jones and Hill soon. Maybe you just front load the piss out of the deal? [Reply]
Originally Posted by Mother****erJones:
Problem is you have to pay Fuller, Jones and Hill soon. Maybe you just front load the piss out of the deal?
Just a week ago I had it in my head that we’d soon be paying $18M per year for Peters, so I don’t mind the money aspect. If they can front load it, then yes I would. [Reply]