Originally Posted by Marcellus:
This is pretty low rent no matter how you look at it. Its not some random attention whore fan's responsibility to try to smear a man's name and ruin his career because he doesn't want them coaching for the Chiefs anymore.
Marty has already stated that wasn't his goal. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Hammock Parties:
Marty has already stated that wasn't his goal.
Article lays out that:
1. Bienemy's lack of HC jobs is not because of race. (which I believe)
2. Bienemy cost them the SB against the Bucs.
3. Bienemy doesn't listen to his players feedback.
4. Bienemy fucked up going to a third Super Bowl.
But we don't have it out for Bienemy guys! Promise! [Reply]
Originally Posted by The Franchise:
Article lays out that:
1. Bienemy's lack of HC jobs is not because of race. (which I believe)
2. Bienemy cost them the SB against the Bucs.
3. Bienemy doesn't listen to his players feedback.
4. Bienemy fucked up going to a third Super Bowl.
But we don't have it out for Bienemy guys! Promise!
If the article was to be believed, EB is an egomaniac who interviews terribly because he's unprepared and costs his team games out of spite. If it was true and believed it would 100% cost EB his job. How could you spin it any other way? [Reply]
Originally Posted by Hammock Parties:
Nothing in it was false.
What I hear on 610: "I don't KNOW that this is true."
Because they don't know shit. Or they would have been screaming about it.
I do not live anywhere near the 610 coverage area and am not searching out what they say, but until legit names come out and validate this story it’s all bogus. Unnamed sources don’t count. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Chiefs=Champions:
If the article was to be believed, EB is an egomaniac who interviews terribly because he's unprepared and costs his team games out of spite. If it was true and believed it would 100% cost EB his job. How could you spin it any other way?
I definitely disagree with the spin at the end.
He's done.
"Spite" isn't the right word...more like...ego...pride. [Reply]