Chiefs *****The L'Jarius Sneed Thread***** - Page 46

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuzu...eRichEisenShow

Listen at Chris Long talk about Sneed and how by the end of the game he was literally standing in front of the Phins sideline letting them know who the alpha was.
[Reply]

This is where that play happened...........

2 & 10 - MIA 29(5:16 - 4th) T.Tagovailoa pass incomplete short left to J.Waddle.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by emaw1979:
It should have been a penalty on Sneed. You can't purposely bait a player into jumping offsides.

I think they changed that rule a while back, didn't they? Now you can move on defense as long as you're not in the neutral zone, or something like that.
[Reply]

There's probably a gif in this thread somewhere, but remember in his rookie year when Sneed snuffed an offensive tackle in the open field? That was good foreshadowing. He's got bayou strength.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Rain Man:
I think they changed that rule a while back, didn't they? Now you can move on defense as long as you're not in the neutral zone, or something like that.

Correct.

IT used to be that you could jump past the LOS and as long as you got back before the ball was snapped, it was ok.

They changed it. So if you go over the line it's offsides/encroachment no matter what.

But you can do whatever you want on your side of the LOS
[Reply]

[Reply]

Originally Posted by emaw1979:
It should have been a penalty on Sneed. You can't purposely bait a player into jumping offsides.

As long as he stayed on our side of the LoS, which he did, he was fine.

If you move into the neutral zone or the other side of the LoS and it causes an offensive player to move, then the penalty is on the defender.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties:

Outstanding! :-)
[Reply]

Originally Posted by MAHOMO 4 LIFE!:

Stop playin' with him. pic.twitter.com/ZZK7Q7cPq5
— Kansas City Chiefs (@Chiefs) January 15, 2024

sneed has done something similar to this every week against every #1 WR. What he did to Justin Jefferson was FILTHY.

Reminds me of Eric Fisher absolutely burying JJ Watt.

No way is Sneed NOT a Chief next year, unless we get a haul of picks nearing Tyreek levels.

Guys like Sneed force opposing QBs to go to their second read immediately, or to force a pass into great coverage. That disrupts every passing game, every week.

As long as there are no long term medical concerns (and there may be) the kid deserves to play his prime years in KC. We have paid him peanuts for 4 years, it’s time to pay the man.
[Reply]

On Good Morning Football Sneed won the "Angry Round" Sceptre.

For his brutal jam on Tyreek Hill

How cool is that?
[Reply]

I've said it before and I'll say it again; Pay the man! Of all of our looming free agents he is the one I want back the most.
[Reply]

Fair play

https://x.com/PFF/status/1746955956787810745?s=20
[Reply]

Good on Tyreek for acknowledging that he got owned there. Actually gives me a level of respect for him that I had lost with all the petty jabs he's been taking this season.
[Reply]

Sneed IMO has become the top priority this offseason. CJ95 is important, but at his age (and financial demands) there are questions. Sneed is younger and damn he has always been good, but he's been breaking WRs this year. Plus, he will be cheaper to keep than CJ95.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by kcgreene:
Sneed IMO has become the top priority this offseason. CJ95 is important, but at his age (and financial demands) there are questions. Sneed is younger and damn he has always been good, but he's been breaking WRs this year. Plus, he will be cheaper to keep than CJ95.

Yep if you have to choose one, Jones is the odd man out. Tag and trade likely incoming so Jones gets to at least have a say in where he retires, similar to Tyreek. Unless Jones is all of a sudden feeling the burden of age and wants to retire a Chief for a discount.
[Reply]