Originally Posted by Shiver Me Timbers:
Gorilla that is the problem- Nobody in the front office FULLY thought thru the actual /potential consequences with K Hunt release. With Tyreek- They are living once bitten twice shy. Damned if you Do / Damned if you don't has turned into the waiting game we are all living.
There was literally no downside to keeping Hunt; I said the same at the time. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla:
There was literally no downside to keeping Hunt; I said the same at the time.
Yes yes yes
Just don't get what releasing him proved, beyond the fact that no one is going to care when he takes the field in week 9 this year and the Chiefs got absolutely nothing for him. [Reply]
Just don't get what releasing him proved, beyond the fact that no one is going to care when he takes the field in week 9 this year and the Chiefs got absolutely nothing for him.
I think the Chiefs expected the NFL to suspend him for the entire next season. They won't make the same mistake twice. Everyone knew he would suit up again. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla:
There was literally no downside to keeping Hunt; I said the same at the time.
I know that and regardless of what the uber lib /sjw crowd is espousing
I agree WITH YOU- as bad as it sound to the guy who works 9-5, drives a Prius and spends his weekend protesting the guberment for the injustice of the day.
Originally Posted by 007:
I think the Chiefs expected the NFL to suspend him for the entire next season. They won't make the same mistake twice. Everyone knew he would suit up again.
Even if they did, what’s the advantage in releasing him? [Reply]
Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla:
Lord knows the Browns are certainly taking it on the chin.
Well of course, they are the saviors that provided him a second chance. They come out smelling like roses. He will probably get comeback player of the year too.
Originally Posted by cooper barrett:
Just how does having 1/2 of your offence being violent crininals charged or not affect he value of the team?
At what point does Clark say Take the offer, get it in front of the League. I quit?
So "violent criminals" is now kicking a racist, drunk chick in the ass ...Damn, I think Quentin Tarantino has his next villain for a new movie.
"Dont look him in eye...He's been known to kick people in the ass for calling him n#gger...even the rarest of all cherished life-forms arent safe...a white entitled brat from the suburbs...he knows no bounds. He's a dangerous monster"
After the initial media releases, Hill looks like he probably didn't do it. We don't know and until we know the team shouldn't release him. Unless there is concrete proof, hell no. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Shiver Me Timbers:
I know that and regardless of what the uber lib /sjw crowd is espousing
I agree WITH YOU- as bad as it sound to the guy who is unemployed, plays Call of Duty 36 (or whatever installment it is now) all day, reposts _____'s latest fiery tweet about free shit, gun control, and orange man bad, then spends his weekend protesting the guberment for the injustice of the day
What if the Chiefs went ahead and announced that Tyreek will be back with the team next year?
Take the media shit storm now and no one will care by the time the season starts. There will be a bit of a circus at training camp, but this at least gives our players time to prepare for that. Reid has plenty of time to coach everyone up on their responses to the reporters. [Reply]