That’s not mid play lol that’s just quitting. With that out there I’d think he’d be reasonable cost wise because he clearly doesn’t want to be a steeler. [Reply]
Originally Posted by duncan_idaho:
Sweat would be a potentially interesting alternative as trade compensation for Sneed, if the Chiefs are no longer convinced they can keep Jones.
Anudike-Uzomah worriers would be able to officially worry at that point (because KC doesn't go trade for Sweat and commit to him long-term if it is confident in Anudike-Uzomah being a good player).
I just don't see how were able to part with picks at the moment given the limited amount plus likely guys were going to lose in the next few years due to drafting so well. Going to be crucial to have picks and hit on them as well [Reply]
Trade: Broncos and Browns agreed to a deal today that will send WR Jerry Jeudy to Cleveland in exchange for two draft picks, sources tell ESPN.
Cleveland made a run at Jeudy at last season’s trade deadline. Now the Browns finally will get him once trade is processed this week. pic.twitter.com/G0XlwDXlAr
The more I think about it the more I think the chiefs probably call about Dionte. He plays outside, can beat man, can beat press he’s an elite route runner and it looks like he’s under contract for 15mil this year. It would give the chiefs the option to extend or just let it ride.
And we were in on Mike evans for significantly more than that. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Chris Meck:
The more I think about it, the more Sneed to Detroit for #29 makes sense.
That team is close, CB is a huge need, and Sneed is a sure thing that no draftee is.
Would give us a pretty good shot at securing both a franchise left tackle and elite wide receiver in one of the best LT/WR drafts of recent memory.
Makes sense for both the Lions and Chiefs. Im sure most Lions fans would be perfectly fine going all in to win a Super Bowl. They are so close. The Chiefs are building for the long haul and desperately need a LT on a rookie contract and an elite receiver to pair with Rice. [Reply]