NFL odds: After Sunday night, Patrick Mahomes is now the overwhelming NFL MVP favorite
Frank Schwab 2 hrs ago
We can cease and desist with any debate about someone other than Patrick Mahomes being the NFL MVP favorite.
You’ll hear people argue that Kyler Murray, Russell Wilson, Alvin Kamara or anyone else should be “in the conversation,” but the only real talk is that the Kansas City Chiefs quarterback is the overwhelming favorite until further notice. Everyone else is vying for NFL offensive player of the year, though Mahomes should probably win that too.
Sunday night’s heroics, leading a game-winning drive over the Las Vegas Raiders everyone knew was coming, solidified Mahomes’ position. He’s the best player in football and he’s having a phenomenal year.
The odds at BetMGM reflect that.
Mahomes is -118 to win MVP at BetMGM. Next on the list is Wilson at +350. Aaron Rodgers is +550 and nobody else is less than 12-to-1. [Reply]
Originally Posted by DRM08:
OL is a weapon, a huge one for Rodgers. He would have struggled big time yesterday with KC’s dogshit OL against the Saints.
Rodgers wouldn't have finished the game yesterday and would have likely taken at least twice the sacks that Patrick did, due to his limited mobility. [Reply]
Originally Posted by ChiTown:
I think he likes to ignore the fact that Davante Adams is sub to Tyreek Hill (lol), and that Aaron Jones someone doesn't exist. Valdes-Scantling has better stats than any of our secondary WR's. The only clear cut win we have, and it's a big one, is Kelce. But, he completely negates the fact that the GB OL is one of the best in the NFL. He assumes that means little in the way that it impacts Rogers effectiveness. Would love to see A-Aron try and put up his current stats behind the KC OL.
Kelce is the best tight end in the NFL (by a long shot). But Robert Tonyan is a top 5 TE this season. Rodgers has a weapon there. [Reply]
Originally Posted by NEOM:
Hill, Kelce, Watkins, Hardman, Bell, CEH have more quality than Adams, Jones, MVS.
Watkins is injured more than he is healthy, Hardman is fast but can't even overtake Watkins as the #2 receiver in spite of injuries or worse DRob. Bell is not the same caliber of RB he was in Pittsburgh and Jones is a far superior RB to CEH at this point. I like how you ignore the superior OLine that Rodgers has. [Reply]
Originally Posted by tredadda:
Watkins is injured more than he is healthy, Hardman is fast but can't even overtake Watkins as the #2 receiver in spite of injuries or worse DRob. Bell is not the same caliber of RB he was in Pittsburgh and Jones is a far superior RB to CEH at this point. I like how you ignore the superior OLine that Rodgers has.
Because the Packers OLine never really performed, when up against a strong defence. [Reply]