Originally Posted by MagicHef:
I’d rather not give up picks for an HC, but there is the fact that Drew Brees wasn’t really “Drew Brees” until he went to NO. Did Payton have anything to do with that?
His TD % was higher in '04 than all but two seasons in NO, and much higher than his first three years in NO. Other than higher yardage totals, due to throwing a lot more, what's so much better about his early years in NO?
Most QBs are at their best in their late 20s, no? [Reply]
Originally Posted by Old Dog:
When your other CB's are little more effective than cardboard cutouts, why would anyone throw against the decent one?
Because he's covering your best receiver? Any team who pays an elite receiver is just throwing away their money when they go against the Broncos, and that's all thanks to Surtain. I can see why KC didn't want to pay Tyreek. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe:
Because he's covering your best receiver? Any team who pays an elite receiver is just throwing away their money when they go against the Broncos, and that's all thanks to Surtain. I can see why KC didn't want to pay Tyreek.
Only YOU could see it that way... I bet every time you see Surtain, you wish you had Parsons. The same way that you used to see Chubb and wish for Allen. :-) [Reply]
Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe:
Because he's covering your best receiver? Any team who pays an elite receiver is just throwing away their money when they go against the Broncos, and that's all thanks to Surtain. I can see why KC didn't want to pay Tyreek.
The mental gymnastics you put your mind through to come up with these cause/effect instances is crazy. Why is it that two of the most deranged and retarded posters on this board are both Donkey fans? [Reply]
Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe:
Because he's covering your best receiver? Any team who pays an elite receiver is just throwing away their money when they go against the Broncos, and that's all thanks to Surtain. I can see why KC didn't want to pay Tyreek.
Yep. You nailed it. KC didn't re-sign Hill because they were concerned about a team they haven't lost to since 2015. :-) [Reply]
Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe:
Because he's covering your best receiver? Any team who pays an elite receiver is just throwing away their money when they go against the Broncos, and that's all thanks to Surtain. I can see why KC didn't want to pay Tyreek.
So you think Oakland's decision to trade for and pay Davante Adams was dumb? Because he roasted Surtain for a GW TD. He also had over 100 yards in BOTH games against the Donkos.
Guess Surtain only shows up to play for 'certain' elite WR's . . . . . . [Reply]
Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe:
Because he's covering your best receiver? Any team who pays an elite receiver is just throwing away their money when they go against the Broncos, and that's all thanks to Surtain. I can see why KC didn't want to pay Tyreek.
