Originally Posted by RaidersOftheCellar:
Remember when he said that only 5 or 6 Chiefs could start for Denver? And some of Denver's backups were better than KC starters? :-)
True to form you are back to what you do best. Congratulations on them receiving votes. Not making 1st or 2nd team All Pro, but receiving votes. [Reply]
If anyone needs a graphical representation of how well the Tyreek Hill worked out for the Chiefs, show them this. @ericeager_ was right about this from the get-go (as he is with most things) pic.twitter.com/6D9lsIBsVj
Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe:
How good would the Chiefs be if they lost:
Their #2 WR to an ACL before the season started
Their #1 RB to an ACL by week 4
Their starting LT, Center and #2 Corner for the season by week 5
Their number 1 TE for the first 5 and last 2 games
Both of their starting edge defenders for the last 8 games
Their best safety for 5 games
Their best interior rusher for 4 games
All while their QB was playing through a torn lat in his throwing shoulder and a partially torn hamstring for a chunk of the season?
Probably at least 13-4 like the 49ers who are down to a 3rd string QB who's outplayed Mr Limited this season and suffered other key injuries to legit star players throughout the year.
I already told you Denver's injuries gave nothing to do with their record. That falls on your declining, out of shape QB, who will only suffer more injuries as time goes on. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe:
How good would the Chiefs be if they lost:
Their #2 WR to an ACL before the season started
Their #1 RB to an ACL by week 4
Their starting LT, Center and #2 Corner for the season by week 5
Their number 1 TE for the first 5 and last 2 games
Both of their starting edge defenders for the last 8 games
Their best safety for 5 games
Their best interior rusher for 4 games
All while their QB was playing through a torn lat in his throwing shoulder and a partially torn hamstring for a chunk of the season?
Chiefs lost their number 1 RB, had a LB better than anything on Denver get suspended for a key game against the Bills, lost a CB for a few games that had a better rookie season than Surtain, lost their number 1 WR for a few games...etc [Reply]
Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe:
How good would the Chiefs be if they lost:
Their #2 WR to an ACL before the season started
Their #1 RB to an ACL by week 4
Their starting LT, Center and #2 Corner for the season by week 5
Their number 1 TE for the first 5 and last 2 games
Both of their starting edge defenders for the last 8 games
Their best safety for 5 games
Their best interior rusher for 4 games
All while their QB was playing through a torn lat in his throwing shoulder and a partially torn hamstring for a chunk of the season?
Tim Patrick is another Byron Pringle. We'd be fine.
We lose RBs to injury (and kicking women) all the fucking time, and the offense never skips a beat, dipshit.
The Chiefs were missing their starting LG, C, and RT in 2015 and won a playoff game and rattled off like 9 straight wins to end the year
All of your TEs are crap. You lose the "top" guy and one of them is just as good as the next
It's your own fucking fault for signing Randy Gregory in the first place, dipshit. The Chiefs haven't had that problem because we don't invest in brokedicks.
And the rest of those injuries are temporary. 4 games? You can't go 4-5 games without a certain non-QB starter playing? Well, in your case, if your starting QB missed 4-5 games, you'd have a better chance of winning.
Great teams find ways to get it done in spite of the injuries they face. They're not the same team, no, but they don't melt into a puddle of vaginas like you did [Reply]
