Chiefs 2019 Free agency Thread - Page 378

We don't really have one of these yet, so figured we could use this as a place to discuss potential free agent acquisitions and what we would like to look for them to bring in.

If any of you guys are interested, heres a good place to do some research.

https://overthecap.com/
[Reply]

Originally Posted by htismaqe:
Ziggy Ansah's career sacks by year:

8, 7.5, 14.5, 2, 12, 4

Dee Ford's:

0, 4, 10, 0, 13

It's obvious who is better to anybody being objective about it.

where are you getting your stats? I'm not arguing who's better. I hope someone offers a second(please) and we trade him.

But I don't see those numbers.

http://www.espn.com/nfl/player/stats...16707/dee-ford
https://www.pro-football-reference.c...F/FordDe00.htm
http://www.nfl.com/player/deeford/2543494/profile
[Reply]

We've got like a 1% chance of signing Bell.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19:
Well, I just think Mortensen is probably talking about KC. And maybe Philly.

Not that.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by O.city:
That's fine. That's why they're trying to trade him.

But you can't whitewash Ansah as this pillar of consistency and health when he hasn't played a full season since 2015 and has had his sack numbers diminishing.

I never said he was consistent and/or healthy. I said he was MORE consistent than Ford.

Not really a high bar, honestly.
[Reply]

Why are some wanting to pay Bell? I get he's good but meh.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19:
Well, I just think Mortensen is probably talking about KC. And maybe Philly.

He wasn't talking about Bell, he was talking about Ford.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Simply Red:
I do!!! I will spray cum all over the galaxy!

The rep thread will be hot and sticky
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Superturtle:
Oh boy. This discussion again.

:-)
[Reply]

I wouldn't be shocked at all if we signed Bell.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by htismaqe:
Ziggy Ansah's career sacks by year:

8, 7.5, 14.5, 2, 12, 4

Dee Ford's:

0, 4, 10, 0, 13

It's obvious who is better to anybody being objective about it.

it's obvious that in 2 of the last 3 years, Ford's been better.

As for what happened 4 years ago - who gives a shit?

I mean c'mon, if you're betting on who will be better going forward, the answer is Ford. And I like Ziggy. Hell, he might even be a better fit for this particular scheme.

But you've gotta hand waive a lot on both Ziggy's resume AND Ford's resume over the last 3 years to just say "it's obvious" that Ansah's the better player. It ain't.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Superturtle:
I wouldn't be shocked at all if we signed Bell.

Me either, especially with how relatively quiet the Bell rumor mill has been.

That’s a Veach trademark.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by JohnDONsey:
Bell seems more douchey than cancerous, I’d be much more comfortable signing him than, say, bringing in AB.

me too!
[Reply]

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut:
it's obvious that in 2 of the last 3 years, Ford's been better.

As for what happened 4 years ago - who gives a shit?

I mean c'mon, if you're betting on who will be better going forward, the answer is Ford. And I like Ziggy. Hell, he might even be a better fit for this particular scheme.

But you've gotta hand waive a lot on both Ziggy's resume AND Ford's resume over the last 3 years to just say "it's obvious" that Ansah's the better player. It ain't.

If I could have Ansah and player x for the next 2 or 3 years vs Ford for just one, that's a pretty easy decision.

But it's more financial than anything.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by JohnDONsey:
Me either, especially with how relatively quiet the Bell rumor mill has been.

That’s a Veach trademark.

It's the quiet before the storm - he's about to drop science on the Raiders! (maybe)
[Reply]