Because of all the interest in this thread, I've place all of the video content of Patrick Mahomes II's college career, and draft day goodness into a single post that can be found here. Enjoy! [Reply]
Considering the state of the offensive line in 2014-2015, 45 sacks isn't surprising.
Lol ok. 45 sacks then, not 50 my bad!
He's been sacked 44, 39, 45 & 45 times in his previous 4 full seasons. It's not 50, but it's still bad.
Again, my point was that hes always had a quick release and looked to get rid of the ball quickly...yet he was still sacked 40-45 times.
But not last year because the OLine was really good in pass protection. So good that Alex Smith, who usually is sacked 40-45 times a year, was only sacked 28 times last year.
Not really trying to bash Alex here, just trying to defend an OLine that allowed the fewest pressures in the league and held up a QB that usually gets sacked a lot more. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Priest31kc:
Lol ok. 45 sacks then, not 50 my bad!
He's been sacked 44, 39, 45 & 45 times in his previous 4 full seasons. It's not 50, but it's still bad.
Again, my point was that hes always had a quick release and looked to get rid of the ball quickly...yet he was still sacked 40-45 times.
But not last year because the OLine was really good in pass protection. So good that Alex Smith, who usually is sacked 40-45 times a year, was only sacked 28 times last year.
Not really trying to bash Alex here, just trying to defend an OLine that allowed the fewest pressures in the league and held up a QB that usually gets sacked a lot more.
Your point of view on this is not difficult for most of us to understand. You are making yourself very clear. Reading comprehension is not everyone's strong suit. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla:
what do you call people who advocated drafting Geno Smith, some at 1.1?
Visionaries.
The Chiefs finally started seeing it our way this offseason.
You have to take a risk once in awhile.
Keep in mind the Chiefs could have had Geno and Alex...and now we have Alex and Mahomes, at a similar cost, but we've squandered four years in the process. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Hammock Parties:
Visionaries.
The Chiefs finally started seeing it our way this offseason.
You have to take a risk once in awhile.
Keep in mind the Chiefs could have had Geno and Alex...and now we have Alex and Mahomes, at a similar cost, but we've squandered four years in the process.
We haven't squandered four years. We won a playoff game and got back to a winning culture after a 2-14 pathetic year. We are doing fine. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Hammock Parties:
Visionaries.
The Chiefs finally started seeing it our way this offseason.
You have to take a risk once in awhile.
Keep in mind the Chiefs could have had Geno and Alex...and now we have Alex and Mahomes at a similar cost, but we've squandered four years in the process.
Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla:
what do you call people who advocated drafting Geno Smith, some at 1.1?
I wanted Mahomes. I love Mahomes.
I root for Alex smith. I think we can go to a super bowl with him.
I would prefer to start Mahomes this year.
I advocated drafting Geno Smith 1.1.
I advocated drafting Russell Wilson.
I advocated drafting Paxton Lynch.
I hated Matt Cassell and celebrated the Clay bashing of him.
I guess I am a true fan hater homer troll.
Mostly, I just want great QB play and I am willing to root for any player who can give it to us. smith has had moments of brilliance but epochs of meh. But I always give people the chance to prove me wrong. Arguing about the future is dumb, but not as dumb as pretending the past is different than it was. [Reply]
Originally Posted by saphojunkie:
Mostly, I just want great QB play and I am willing to root for any player who can give it to us. smith has had moments of brilliance but epochs of meh. But I always give people the chance to prove me wrong. Arguing about the future is dumb, but not as dumb as pretending the past is different than it was.