Originally Posted by Bwana:
Once again, don't come in this thread with some kind of political agenda, or you will be shown the door. If you want to go that route, there is a thread about this in DC.
Originally Posted by Dartgod:
People, there is a lot of good information in this thread, let's try to keep the petty bickering to a minimum.
We all have varying opinions about the impact of this, the numbers, etc. We will all never agree with each other. But we can all keep it civil.
Thanks!
Click here for the original OP:
Spoiler!
Apparently the CoronaVirus can survive on a inanimate objects, such as door knobs, for 9 days.
California coronavirus case could be first spread within U.S. community, CDC says
By SOUMYA KARLAMANGLA, JACLYN COSGROVE
FEB. 26, 2020 8:04 PM
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is investigating what could be the first case of novel coronavirus in the United States involving a patient in California who neither recently traveled out of the country nor was in contact with someone who did.
“At this time, the patient’s exposure is unknown. It’s possible this could be an instance of community spread of COVID-19, which would be the first time this has happened in the United States,” the CDC said in a statement. “Community spread means spread of an illness for which the source of infection is unknown. It’s also possible, however, that the patient may have been exposed to a returned traveler who was infected.”
The individual is a resident of Solano County and is receiving medical care in Sacramento County, according to the state Department of Public Health.
The CDC said the “case was detected through the U.S. public health system — picked up by astute clinicians.”
Officials at UC Davis Medical Center expanded on what the federal agency might have meant by that in an email sent Wednesday, as reported by the Davis Enterprise newspaper.
The patient arrived at UC Davis Medical Center from another hospital Feb. 19 and “had already been intubated, was on a ventilator, and given droplet protection orders because of an undiagnosed and suspected viral condition,” according to an email sent by UC Davis officials that was obtained by the Davis Enterprise.
The staff at UC Davis requested COVID-19 testing by the CDC, but because the patient didn’t fit the CDC’s existing criteria for the virus, a test wasn’t immediately administered, according to the email. The CDC then ordered the test Sunday, and results were announced Wednesday. Hospital administrators reportedly said in the email that despite these issues, there has been minimal exposure at the hospital because of safety protocols they have in place.
A UC Davis Health spokesperson declined Wednesday evening to share the email with The Times.
Since Feb. 2, more than 8,400 returning travelers from China have entered California, according to the state health department. They have been advised to self-quarantine for 14 days and limit interactions with others as much as possible, officials said.
“This is a new virus, and while we are still learning about it, there is a lot we already know,” Dr. Sonia Angell, director of the California Department of Public Health, said in a statement. “We have been anticipating the potential for such a case in the U.S., and given our close familial, social and business relationships with China, it is not unexpected that the first case in the U.S. would be in California.”
It is not clear how the person became infected, but public health workers could not identify any contacts with people who had traveled to China or other areas where the virus is widespread. That raises concern that the virus is spreading in the United States, creating a challenge for public health officials, experts say.
“It’s the first signal that we could be having silent transmission in the community,” said Lawrence Gostin, director of the World Health Organization Collaborating Center on National and Global Health Law. “It probably means there are many more cases out there, and it probably means this individual has infected others, and now it’s a race to try to find out who that person has infected.”
On Tuesday, the CDC offered its most serious warning to date that the United States should expect and prepare for the coronavirus to become a more widespread health issue.
“Ultimately, we expect we will see coronavirus spread in this country,” said Nancy Messonnier, director of the CDC’s National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases. “It’s not so much a question of if, but a question of when.”
According to the CDC’s latest count Wednesday morning, 59 U.S. residents have tested positive for the new strain of coronavirus — 42 of whom are repatriated citizens from a Diamond Princess cruise. That number has grown by two since Messonnier’s last count Tuesday, although the CDC was not immediately available to offer details on the additional cases.
More than 82,000 cases of coronavirus have been reported globally, and more than 2,700 people have died, with the majority in mainland China, the epicenter of the outbreak.
But public health leaders have repeatedly reminded residents that the health risk from the novel coronavirus to the general public remains low.
“While COVID-19 has a high transmission rate, it has a low mortality rate,” the state Department of Public Health said in a statement Wednesday. “From the international data we have, of those who have tested positive for COVID-19, approximately 80% do not exhibit symptoms that would require hospitalization. There have been no confirmed deaths related to COVID-19 in the United States to date.”
CDC officials have also warned that although the virus is likely to spread in U.S. communities, the flu still poses a greater risk.
Gostin said the news of potential silent transmission does not eliminate the possibility of containing the virus in the U.S. and preventing an outbreak.
“There are few enough cases that we should at least try,” he said. “Most of us are not optimistic that that will be successful, but we’re still in the position to try.”
Originally Posted by Monticore:
Do you think what you are doing is helping in reducing infections? As long as cases keep going up mask mandates and lockdowns are going to happen , what you are doing is actually increasing that the things you are fighting against are likelier to happen.
Perhaps the people presenting the data should have a bit more integrity? It might help.
Most people who won't wear a mask do it for political reasons. And you are saying that political leaders manipulating data to try and fool people into wearing masks is a way to get those people to listen????
Originally Posted by Hawker007:
Do people actually believe that counties in KS that have mandated mask wearing has decreased cases by 6% while counties that haven’t mandated masks wearing has increased cases of 200%? People actually believe that?
I can see mask wearing having a better result, like only an increase in cases of 80% compared to 200% or something like that. But I’d be shocked if there is a single county in KS that has a decrease in cases right now over just about any time period you want to use.
No. Pete believes that cases have increased by 207% in mask-mandated counties, however. [Reply]
Originally Posted by BigRedChief:
Residents may leave Florida facilities for Thanksgiving, could bring coronavirus back
Advocates and experts are concerned that nursing homes and assisted-living facilities aren’t required to test residents for the coronavirus when they return after the holidays.
Originally Posted by Hawker007:
Do people actually believe that counties in KS that have mandated mask wearing has decreased cases by 6% while counties that haven’t mandated masks wearing has increased cases of 200%? People actually believe that?
I can see mask wearing having a better result, like only an increase in cases of 80% compared to 200% or something like that. But I’d be shocked if there is a single county in KS that has a decrease in cases right now over just about any time period you want to use.
The actual numbers bear out what the Sentinel article states. At least I have yet to see any numbers that say otherwise. Some just refuse to accept the fact that a mask mandate does not mean cases drop by default. I know here in JoCo we have had a mask mandate since July 3rd and cases have done the opposite of go down.
And to clarify they are saying cases per 100k population are up 207% in mask mandated counties. [Reply]
Originally Posted by petegz28:
So I should embrace being lied to? :-)
Perhaps the people presenting the data should have a bit more integrity? It might help.
Most people who won't wear a mask do it for political reasons. And you are saying that political leaders manipulating data to try and fool people into wearing masks is a way to get those people to listen????
Okay.....
I have lied to my kids with the purpose of doing something in their best interest knowing that they might not completely understand the situation ,cherry picking data isn’t always lying , you do it all the time. [Reply]
Originally Posted by petegz28:
The actual numbers bear out what the Sentinel article states. At least I have yet to see any numbers that say otherwise. Some just refuse to accept the fact that a mask mandate does not mean cases drop by default. I know here in JoCo we have had a mask mandate since July 3rd and cases have done the opposite of go down.
And to clarify they are saying cases per 100k population are up 207% in mask mandated counties.
What about global numbers from all countries? [Reply]
Originally Posted by Monticore:
I have lied to my kids with the purpose of doing something in their best interest knowing that they might not completely understand the situation ,cherry picking data isn’t always lying , you do it all the time.
JFC this isn't dealing with your kids. WOW Just stop. [Reply]
Originally Posted by petegz28:
So what did they say that was wrong? Oh yea, nothing. :-)
It's not my fault they shoved your bullshit back in your face. Just accept it and move on.
At this point just about anyone who keeps up with this thread has learned not to trust anything you post or post a link to.
The vast majority of the time it's just more bullshit if not out right ridiculous. [Reply]
Originally Posted by stumppy:
At this point just about anyone who keeps up with this thread has learned not to trust anything you post or post a link to.
The vast majority of the time it's just more bullshit if not out right ridiculous.
In other words you can't disprove a fucking thing so you attack me. :-)
Originally Posted by Monticore:
Sometimes it feels like it.
So what is your end game anyways? What is your goal right now it just comes off as a bunch of whining.
Same as everyone else's. To get life back to normal. You're the one that has spent the morning whining and rationalizing telling lies to people to get them to do your bidding. All I did was present facts as they relate to the state of Kansas and said that if you want people to listen then you should start with telling the truth and not lying.
Originally Posted by petegz28:
The actual numbers bear out what the Sentinel article states. At least I have yet to see any numbers that say otherwise. Some just refuse to accept the fact that a mask mandate does not mean cases drop by default. I know here in JoCo we have had a mask mandate since July 3rd and cases have done the opposite of go down.
And to clarify they are saying cases per 100k population are up 207% in mask mandated counties.
Ok, there was a graph posted this week in this thread from the CDC or KDHE, can’t recall which. It stated cases in mask mandated counties have decreased 6% and non mask mandated counties have increased by like 200%. I thought this was related. [Reply]
Originally Posted by petegz28:
In other words you can't disprove a fucking thing so you attack me. :-)
Fuck yourself, Stump.
See you game chat, Stump.
Everyone is free to look through your post history in this thread.
Maybe you can find another Dr who claims to have the cure for covid. You remember that bullshit you were pushing, don't you?
That's just one off the top of my head.